| 在线人数: | |
| 总访问量: | |
| 总文章量: |
|
|
Amid the recent political shift within Chinesepolitics, the effort
at modernizing and advancing its military hasremained
unchanged.
在中国政坛最近的政治交接中，其对军事现代化和军事进步方面的努力一如既往。
Minnie Chan of the South China Morning Postreports that to
demonstrate this unwavering effort, China todayconfirmed the first
successful carrier landings of its J-15 fighteraboard its first
aircraft carrier the Liaoning.
南华早报记者MinnieChan的报道也印证了这一坚定不移的努力。报道说，中国今天确认了搭载在她第一艘航空母舰辽宁号上的舰载机J-15的首次成功着舰实验。
The landings are the culmination of ayears-long effort at refitting
the Soviet-era carrier, originallychristened the Varyag, and are
perhaps the most difficult technicalcarrier maneuvers to
accomplish.
这次着舰使为改装前苏联时代航母瓦良格号而进行的长达数年的努力达到了一个顶点，或许也标志其掌握了最为困难的航母操控技术。
Testing on land-based, carrier shaped decks,has been going on for
months, so this recent achievement is causinga bit of celebration.
While not the culmination of China’s entryinto a functioning
carrier military power, the successful landingsput it on track to
enter that club with gusto when it addsadditional carriers to the
group.
由于在陆地上的航母模型甲板上的测试已经持续了几个月，所以最近这次成功正在引起一些赞扬之声。虽然这不是中国进入掌控航空母舰军事力量集团的终点，但在她为这个集团又增添了额外的航母之后，这次成功着舰则使她兴致盎然的正式进入了通往那个俱乐部的轨道。
The Liaoning will no doubt serve as China’straining carrier, where
it cuts its teeth on the technical andtactical challenges facing
flattop operations. Rumors havepersisted for some time that Beijing
was building two indigenouscarriers as well, but proof of that has
yet to be seen.
辽宁号无疑将作为中国的训练母舰服役，中国会通过操作辽宁号来获取关于运作航母所要面临的技术和战术挑战方面的经验。有传闻说，北京还在同时建造两艘国产航母，这一传闻已经流传了一段时间了，但还没有相关的证据被发现。
Reports by Chinese media say the first pilotto make an arrested
landing on board aircraft carrier Liaoning isDai Mingmeng.
有中国媒体报道说，在辽宁号航母上作出引人注目的着舰动作的第一个飞行员叫戴明盟。
If
those rumors turn out to be groundless, itlikely won’t be long
before China is producing carriers onits own asChinese shipbuilders
are already clamoring for thechance.
如果那些传言最终被证明是子虚乌有的，由于中国造船企业已经在积极争取这个机会，那么离中国完全依靠自己生产建造航母可能也为时不远了。
The jet that performed the arrested landing,the J-15, is believed
to be a near clone of Russia’s Su-33carrier-based fighter and was
seen sporting Russian AL-31 turbofanengines in 2009. While Russian
military officials have played downthe J-15′s achievement and said
China will no doubt continueseeking to purchase Su-33s, it’s not
likely to get any, and theJ-15 may prove they don’t need them
regardless.
执行引人关注的着舰任务的战斗机，J-15，据信是一个与俄国Su-33舰载战斗机相近的山寨产品，并于2009年被看到其配有俄国AL-31涡扇发动机。尽管俄国军方一直在贬低J-15的性能，并且说中国无疑将继续寻求购买Su-33，但那不太可能了，J-15会证明他们根本不需要Su-33.
China and Russia are at a long-standingimpasse over military deals
after China ripped the Russian Su-27SKdesign and cloned it into the
Shenyang J-11B, violating all sortsof intellectual property
agreements.
中国剽窃了俄罗斯Su-27SK的设计并把它克隆到沈阳J-11B上，而这一行为违反了所有知识产权协议，所以在此之后，中国与俄罗斯的军火交易就处于一个长期的僵局之中。
Finally, these developments come as the U.S.announces the USS
Nimitz is so dysfunctional it cannot be deployedand is pulling the
USS Eisenhower from the Persian Gulf for a quickref-fit before
sending it back to cover for the Nimitz.
最后，这些进展出现的背景是，美国宣布尼米兹号航母故障过于严重而无法部署，并要把艾森豪威尔号从波斯湾召回进行整修之后派去顶替尼米兹号航母。
The Nimitz is about 40 years old anddiscovered a major problem with
its propulsion system duringpre-deployment maneuvers. No word on
how long it may be out ofrotation, but the Eisenhower will be
picking up the slack, at leastin the near future.
尼米兹号已有大约40年的历史了，在预部署演习期间，其推进系统方面发现了大问题。没有关于它会退出轮换多久的消息，但至少在可预见的将来，艾森豪威尔号将填补这个空白。
网民评论：
1.Anton Olff on Nov 23, 7:26 AM
said:
Carriers are still viable, but for how long? Without other ships
and countermeasures to protect the carrier, it is vulnerable to
cheap missile technology. The addition of carriers and other naval
configurations into China’s navy,means that China will play a far
more important role in the future….just as the U.S. and the West
shrink their military capabilities.
航母依然可以存活，问题是它能活多久？没有其它舰船和反制措施来保护母舰，对廉价的导弹技术来说，它是非常脆弱的。把航母及其它相关海军配置增配到中国海军序列中，意味着中国在未来将扮演更为重要的角色。。。而此时恰逢美国和西方缩减了它们的军事力量。
2.Tmac on Nov 23, 7:29 AM said:
@AntonOlff: “…just as the U.S. and the West shrink their military
capabilities.” I’m sorry, but I thought the US was still spending
$1 trillion a year on useless hardware to fight people who live in
caves.Did something change?
@AntonOlff:“。。。而此时恰逢美国和西方缩减了它们的军事力量。”
很抱歉，我倒是认为美国每年依然把数万亿美元花费到没用的硬件装备上好跟住在洞穴里的人作战。有什么改变吗？
3.AntonOlff onNov 23, 7:33 AMsaid: @Tmac:I am just pointing out the
change, not advocating a position. You are correct about useless
hardware. The military budget is bloated and wasteful and much
needs to be cut. This does not mean degrading capabilities.
@Tmac:我这就是在指出改变，并没有提出什么立场。关于没用的硬件装备你是对的。军事预算虚高并且浪费掉了，需要大幅削减。但这不意味着降低军事能力。
4.earlgray1787on Nov 23, 8:54 AM said: @Tmac:Well Said … ha, ha,
ha’ … and funny’.
@Tmac:说得好。。。哈，哈，哈“。。。并且很有意思”。
青春就应该这样绽放 游戏测试：三国时期谁是你最好的兄弟！！ 你不得不信的星座秘密
2012-11-26 05:46:24
Source: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_50b65e040102e2nb.html
