Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By Nicole Morgan (Investigative Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Juan O’ Savin: So it Begins.. When the Tsunami Is Coming.. Bondgate 3/30/26 (Video)

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


 

by N.Morgan

(Turn off VPN, as it can block certain videos, like Rumble)

I may not agree with everything from the content producers I share. Apply critical thinking and use discernment to form your own conclusions about the content in the videos.

FOLLOW ME ON TELEGRAM: https://t.me/NicoleM420

Join Telegram Group: https://t.me/+J3uYoyqtvvY2OTAx

 

 

PPN gets the first assessment up when it comes to the BONDGATE event last week held by Juan O’ Savin. I hope you are sitting down, but then again be ready to move, as what is coming, you should not just stand on the shoreline and watch the water recede. Because what follows is not survivable. No matter what kind of financial planner you have or who you hired to insure your house, your fortune, and your family’s future depend on you preparing for the worst.

I know that much of this won’t make sense, but then again, you will find out about this eventually, and then what?

 

I will be clipping various speeches for Juan speaking and hope to have a better grasp on the Bondgate issue… someday. When the tsunami is coming… Where will you be?

 

Stories Contributed by N. Morgan



Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. "United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.


LION'S MANE PRODUCT


Try Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend 60 Capsules


Mushrooms are having a moment. One fabulous fungus in particular, lion’s mane, may help improve memory, depression and anxiety symptoms. They are also an excellent source of nutrients that show promise as a therapy for dementia, and other neurodegenerative diseases. If you’re living with anxiety or depression, you may be curious about all the therapy options out there — including the natural ones.Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend has been formulated to utilize the potency of Lion’s mane but also include the benefits of four other Highly Beneficial Mushrooms. Synergistically, they work together to Build your health through improving cognitive function and immunity regardless of your age. Our Nootropic not only improves your Cognitive Function and Activates your Immune System, but it benefits growth of Essential Gut Flora, further enhancing your Vitality.



Our Formula includes: Lion’s Mane Mushrooms which Increase Brain Power through nerve growth, lessen anxiety, reduce depression, and improve concentration. Its an excellent adaptogen, promotes sleep and improves immunity. Shiitake Mushrooms which Fight cancer cells and infectious disease, boost the immune system, promotes brain function, and serves as a source of B vitamins. Maitake Mushrooms which regulate blood sugar levels of diabetics, reduce hypertension and boosts the immune system. Reishi Mushrooms which Fight inflammation, liver disease, fatigue, tumor growth and cancer. They Improve skin disorders and soothes digestive problems, stomach ulcers and leaky gut syndrome. Chaga Mushrooms which have anti-aging effects, boost immune function, improve stamina and athletic performance, even act as a natural aphrodisiac, fighting diabetes and improving liver function. Try Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend 60 Capsules Today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link.


Report abuse

Comments

Your Comments
Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

Total 6 comments
  • Sophie

    Mar. 30, WSJ: Trump told aides he’s willing to end the U.S. military campaign against Iran even if the Strait of Hormuz remains largely closed, likely extending Tehran’s firm grip on the waterway and leaving a complex operation to reopen it for a later date.

    In recent days, Trump and his aides assessed that a mission to pry open the chokepoint would push the conflict beyond his timeline of four to six weeks. He decided that the U.S. should achieve its main goals of hobbling Iran’s navy and its missile stocks and wind down current hostilities while pressuring Tehran diplomatically to resume the free flow of trade. If that fails, Washington would press allies in Europe and the Gulf to take the lead on reopening the strait, the officials said.
    ______

    What is Trump’s aimed objectives with this announcement on the Strait of Hormuz?

    ~ Is it for US to remove itself from this conflict? Which would mean it would be the Globalists [Israel] against Iran. By shifting its position, is the Alliance signalling to Israel that any further escalation, and the potential of this being a “forever war” will be at their expense with their own military materiel, personnel?

    ~ “If the Globalists remain defiant, could this stand by Trump serve as a strategic lever? Through Hormuz, this weaponization of energy supplies which is ‘economic sabotage’, would serve as political, financial instability necessary in forcing their surrender.

    ~ Is the underlying tensions…

  • Sophie

    growing for EU member states with Trump pushing them to provide security for Strait of Hormuz? Through Trump’s statement in this critical moment where the prolonged Ukraine/Russia conflict has already drained military stockpiles and strained national budgets, leaving EU economies in a fragile state.”

    ~ Is the strategy twofold? To force the Globalists hands on two fronts – Strait of Hormuz and Ukraine/Russia war. Where deploying to the Strait of Hormuz over-extends their naval forces, draining critical assets from the Baltic and Mediterranean.

    Is this standoff intended to exploit a strategic trade-off between securing energy supplies and defending NATO’s eastern flank, ultimately fracturing the current global order?”

    Is the aim through exerting pressure, EU is forced to revisit Russian gas options or face economic collapse domestically resulting in internal uprising?

    ~ Is this being used to signal domestically that Trump Admin. is not interested in putting boots on the ground? Where the strategy shifts toward diplomatic leverage, with active targeting to exhaust Israel’s interceptor stockpiles.

    ~ Is the Alliance’s aim to send the message to the Globalists that by leaving the Strait “largely closed”, ongoing oil price spikes are being leveraged as a key weapon to further erode their financial strength”? Where the blame would to removed from US as Iran maintains the blockade.
    __________________________________

    Mar 31, NYP: Pres….

  • Sophie

    Trump’s statements -

    - ‘Iran war is likely to end soon’ ‘other nations can reopen the Strait of Hormuz themselves.’
    - “We’re not going to be there too much longer. We’re obliterating the s–t out of them right now, it’s a total obliteration,”
    - “But we won’t have to be there much longer — but we have more work to do in terms of killing their offensive, whatever offensive capability they have left.”
    - ‘other countries can sort out Hormuz,’ ‘I think it’ll automatically open, but my attitude is, I’ve obliterated the country. They have no strength left, and let the countries that are using the strait, let them go and open it…
    - ‘because I would imagine whoever’s controlling the oil will be very happy to open the strait,’
    - When we leave the strait will automatically open.”
    - ‘Trump declined to divulge what exactly the overnight airstrikes hit near Isfahan,’
    ‘said he was surprised at the size of the explosion, which he said showed a substantial on-the ground payload.’
    “I’d rather not say, but you’ll learn soon enough. They were rather large, weren’t they?”
    “It’ll come out, but it was just another one of their wonderful areas that we took care of,”
    That was stuff that we blew up.
    “It was actually bigger than we thought, meaning they had a lot of stuff.
    - ‘we’re taking away their nuclear capability, and we’ve achieved regime change.’
    ‘we’re dealing right now with a totally different…

  • Sophie

    group of people, and they’re much more reasonable than previous, much more reasonable.’
    - “And that is truly regime change.”
    - Trump declined to say if he was considering dispatching his negotiating team.
    “I can’t talk to you about this stuff, all of it. Okay? What do you want me to give, my strategy?
    ______

    France blocked Israel from using its airspace to transport U.S. weapons for the war against Iran over the weekend. — Reuters

    Italy refused permission for the U.S. military to use the Sigonella air base in Sicily for an operation linked to the war on Iran. — AP
    _____

    If viewed from a borderless perspective of this conflict:
    Alliance [US Republic, Russia, Iran loyalists + global military alliance]
    vs.
    Globalists [NATO-Europe, Iran faction, GCC, Israel, Ukraine]

    1) By US Republic stating its removal of US military materiel, personnel, is the aim to weaken the Globalists defense framework? Where perhaps the individual EU, GCC nations are being forced to negotiate directly with US.

    Is the goal to cause “internal erosion” where the Alliance is exploiting economic vulnerabilities domestically, creating “divergent interests,” where the nations are being forced to prioritize their own survival vs the collective objectives of their alliance?

    2) Is Trump’s aim to shift the collective perception of Americans from a “forever war” scenerio to a managed end with US in control of this outcome? The transition to “peace through…

  • Sophie

    strength”.

    3) Are Trump’s statements designed to assert US primacy in decision-making through unilateral power projection? Where he is “leveraging through chaos”, bypassing intl. institutions in order to create a framework outside Globalists control. Is this also setting up for global justice for “crimes against humanity” within the impending “paradigm shift”?

    4) By declining to divulge what exactly the overnight airstrikes hit near Isfahan,’ is the perception of the strike more important than the actual physical damage? Did Iran and US privately agree to sacrifice the infrastructure for public optics, while core assets remain protected?

    Was this done primarily for “deniability & maintenance of the ruse” where the Alliance’s covert cooperation remains intact while fulfilling the need for a high-profile “kinetic” event that satisfies the public and foreign intel.?

    Was this being used for “deterrence of interference” where third party cells remain out of the conflict due to perceived high volatility? Would another aim be to make the US look incompetent after the site is determined to be a “mistake” or a decoy. Whereby causing the Globalists to waste resources in verifying potential future targets?

    5) With the “nuclear” issue playing out at nauseum for years, and public narrative that describes Iran’s program situated securely in deep underground facilities, is Trump’s statement for “decoupling from Globalists oversight? Where…

    • Sophie

      Trump already views their institutions as redundant, would this serve to “desecuritize” the program by moving away from intl. frameworks like the IAEA? Perhaps replaced with a future verification protocol setup by US and Russia.

      6) By stating he is dealing with totally different group of people, ..more reasonable than previous,” is he opening the door for an “off-ramp” for Iran where the appearance of a staged transition would allow Iran to pivot towards a new regional security architecture without an actual surrender?

MOST RECENT
Load more ...

SignUp

Login