Juan O' Savin: Arrest Coming?! Fraud Exposed (Video)
by N.Morgan
(55).jpg)
(Turn off VPN, as it can block certain videos, like Rumble)
I may not agree with everything from the content producers I share. Apply critical thinking and use discernment to form your own conclusions about the content in the videos.
FOLLOW ME ON TELEGRAM: https://t.me/NicoleM420
Join Telegram Group: https://t.me/+J3uYoyqtvvY2OTAx
Juan O’ Savin delivers a critical update discussing claims of fraud exposure and potential legal consequences. The conversation explores how such developments could trigger financial fallout, market volatility, and broader economic uncertainty in the United States.
With rising tension around governance, accountability, and financial systems, this update raises questions about stability, investor confidence, and the potential ripple effects across the economy.
Stories Contributed by N. Morgan
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world. Anyone can join. Anyone can contribute. Anyone can become informed about their world. "United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
LION'S MANE PRODUCT
Try Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend 60 Capsules
Mushrooms are having a moment. One fabulous fungus in particular, lion’s mane, may help improve memory, depression and anxiety symptoms. They are also an excellent source of nutrients that show promise as a therapy for dementia, and other neurodegenerative diseases. If you’re living with anxiety or depression, you may be curious about all the therapy options out there — including the natural ones.Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend has been formulated to utilize the potency of Lion’s mane but also include the benefits of four other Highly Beneficial Mushrooms. Synergistically, they work together to Build your health through improving cognitive function and immunity regardless of your age. Our Nootropic not only improves your Cognitive Function and Activates your Immune System, but it benefits growth of Essential Gut Flora, further enhancing your Vitality.
Our Formula includes: Lion’s Mane Mushrooms which Increase Brain Power through nerve growth, lessen anxiety, reduce depression, and improve concentration. Its an excellent adaptogen, promotes sleep and improves immunity. Shiitake Mushrooms which Fight cancer cells and infectious disease, boost the immune system, promotes brain function, and serves as a source of B vitamins. Maitake Mushrooms which regulate blood sugar levels of diabetics, reduce hypertension and boosts the immune system. Reishi Mushrooms which Fight inflammation, liver disease, fatigue, tumor growth and cancer. They Improve skin disorders and soothes digestive problems, stomach ulcers and leaky gut syndrome. Chaga Mushrooms which have anti-aging effects, boost immune function, improve stamina and athletic performance, even act as a natural aphrodisiac, fighting diabetes and improving liver function. Try Our Lion’s Mane WHOLE MIND Nootropic Blend 60 Capsules Today. Be 100% Satisfied or Receive a Full Money Back Guarantee. Order Yours Today by Following This Link.
| Visits: | 1,804,945,786 |
| Stories: | 8,639,785 |
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
▪︎ Apr. 24, Politico: EU leaders were pressed by Cyprus this week to clarify how the bloc’s little-used mutual defense clause is supposed to work, aiming to better protect member countries while not undermining NATO.
“The treaty is very clear about the what,” Article 42.7 of the EU Treaties which obliges member countries to come to each other’s aid if attacked, but, “The treaty is not clear about what happens when and who does what.” — von der Leyen
▪︎ Apr. 24, Cyprus Pres. Christodoulides: “we need to give substance to this, to establish an operational plan in the event that a member state decides to invoke Article 42(7) of the EU Treaty. “…our common goal of achieving the EU’s strategic autonomy.”
Re: Implementation of Article 42(7): “…it would be necessary to take into account the region where the state in question is located, which states can provide immediate support, what kind of support is needed..” “We have a specific plan, which we will present ..”
▪︎ Apr. 22, Politico: Von der Leyen last weekend seemed to suggest Ankara posed a geostrategic threat to the EU while addressing an audience in Germany.
“We must succeed in completing the European continent so that it does not fall under Russian, Turkish or Chinese influence,” “We must think bigger and more geopolitically.”
▪︎ Apr. 20, Nordic Monitor: A series of recent measures adopted by the govt. of Pres. Erdogan indicates that the…
country is preparing for a war-like scenario, marked by sweeping changes to military and civilian mobilization rules, the expansion of logistical supply systems and an aggressive push to advance missile and drone capabilities.
▪︎ Apr. 18, TruthSocial, Pres. Trump: Has anybody looked at how badly the country of Spain is doing. Their financial numbers, despite contributing almost nothing to NATO and their military defense, are absolutely horrendous. Sad to watch!!! [Globalists' criticism]
_____________________________
Article 42.7 of the Treaty on EU (TEU):
7. If a Member State is the victim of armed aggression on its territory, the other Member States shall have towards it an obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their power, in accordance with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. This shall not prejudice the specific character of the security and defence policy of certain Member States.
Commitments and cooperation in this area shall be consistent with commitments under the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, which, for those States which are members of it, remains the foundation of their collective defence and the forum for its implementation.
______________________________
UN Charter, Article 51
Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defence if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken measures necessary to…
maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.
_______________________________
◇ While the focus is on the Mid East-Iran conflict, it is quite apparent the Clans are attempting to resuscitate their power. The emphasis on Article 42.7 highlights Malta, Ireland, Cyprus, and Austria as the only relevant, non-NATO member states within the EU.
Cyprus, Greece and Turkey appear to be central to this narrative where Russia remains the primary target. Von de Leyen has called Article 42.7 of the Treaty on EU an “obligation” rather than a “voluntary option” with EU leaders actively working on a “blueprint” to operationalize the clause.
◇ Turkey has emerged as the primary, final corridor for Russian pipeline gas to Europe, with Southeast Europe relying heavily on TurkStream and Blue Stream. With the new Hungarian leader prioritizing his nation’s energy sovereignty over EU policies, is the EU becoming more resolute in its push to sever Russia’s energy supply within the region?
◇ Cyprus is using the March drone attack on its soil to strengthen its position on this issue. Yet the strike occurred on…
UK’s base which is sovereign territory, and no proof was provided with regards to the source of the strike. Question is whether the attack was purposefully done to give weight to Article 42.7? Which would imply it was a false flag operation.
◇ Greece, an EU/NATO country, with Turkey part of NATO, and Cyprus part of EU. While RoC is protected under EU, TRNC is a de facto state recognized by Turkey only. Plus UK, a NATO member, not part of EU has Akrotiri and Dhekelia bases in RoC.
RoC’s current protection lies under the EU [Article 42.7], while simultaneously TRNC and RoC are both under the Treaty of Guarantee.
◇ Are the Clans’ plans for a war front with Cyprus and Turkey central to their strategy? A false flag operation where RoC is attacked and TRNC framed as the perpetrator? An attack that would be highly significant and used as a casus belli, with Russia as the primary hidden target.
With ROC internationally recognized, and TRNC framed by EU as under military occupation by Turkey, it would receive widespread international support, effectively delegitimizing TRNC. Would EU activate Article 42.7, as it would provide Brussels the legal and moral pretext to “intervene”? Where Turkey’s military response would frame it as the agressor and RoC as the victim.
◇ As the primary target for the Clans remains Russia, would the conflict serve as a springboard for sabotage of Turkey and Russia’s joint energy infrastructure? To draw Russia into…
the conflict in defense of its economic interests and national security, which would weaken its existing fronts.
◇ What are the primary arguments against such a threat developing through the weaponization of Article 42.7?
~ Turkey’s integration into European defense systems and its role in NATO act as “institutional binding,” where any conflict between member nations would paralyze the alliance.
~ EU and UN recognize the entire island as the Republic of Cyprus. Any military action therefore would be occurring on EU soil between NATO members which would goes against the charter.
~ While EU laws are currently suspended for TRNC, thousands of its residents are legal EU citizens, hence are entitled to same protection as all EU citizens. Even if a military operation were to target Turkey’s military infrastructure, under the EU umbrella, wouldn’t it be defined as an attack on itself?
~ With the restoration of the Republic, would US formally exit the NATO Alliance? If so, wouldn’t it be in the interest of EU to change its stance on Turkey who would then become its largest standing army?
~ Turkey under its NATO commitments is actively contributing to Europe’s security. Would the neutralizing agent for this strategy be Turkey pulling it’s military support from all NATO-Europe fronts as part of its own nation’s security prioritization?
Wouldn’t this be sufficient enough for EU to change course instead of labeling the nation a “geostrategic…
threat to the EU”?
~ The Treaty of Guarantee (1960), Article 1, Paragraph 2, states the RoC “undertakes not to participate, in whole or in part, in any political or economic union with any State whatsoever”. Is RoC legally permitted to be part of EU, which has been given credibility, weight by UN, except according to Guterres the organization is facing imminent financial collapse.
~ As the US Alliance has essentially taken control of the global infrastructure, do all nations gain their sovereignty by default under the new system? If so, aren’t all points moot then? Which would make EU defunct, with member nations gaining their right to self-determination and autonomy. Which would also give Cyprus the same sovereign status where all treaties would cease to exist.
________________
If US can no longer be part of NATO as a sovereign Republic, can it still aid in stability of the region through bi-lateral agreements without the appearance of direct involvement?
While Trump has heavily criticized Spain, is there perhaps a hidden alliance between the two? Where the public friction provides both nations cover for hidden political objectives. With Trump rebuking Spain for refusing to allow use of their joint military bases for strikes on Iran, adding weight to their cover.
PM Sánchez has been one of Israel’s most vocal critics describing its actions in Gaza as “genocide”, and has demanded EU suspend its Association Agreement with Israel.
While…
Pres. Trump has threatened to cut off all trade with Spain.
With Sánchez’s staunch pro-Palestine/diplomatic-leaning view, and Trump’s pro-Israel/anti-Iran view, is this to ensure all discourse is captured within this frame? With Spain’s vocal opposition serving as a pressure valve which allows its influence over nations that are critical of Trump administration policy, which covertly serves their joint objectives.
The premise of this alliance is perhaps to ensure they have a “seat at every table” for a single outcome which may include the dismantling of EU and NATO. Would their alliance also serve to neutralize any potential kinetic confrontation the Clans have planned in the Mediterranean Region?