Vote-fraud-enabling Algorithm Added to New York’s Voter Registration Roll, Says Report

By Selwyn Duke

“I think there is a lot of voter fraud.” So said then-NYC election commissioner, Democrat Alan Schulkin, on hidden video in 2016. Much has changed in the Empire State since that time, however:

Going high tech, it’s now being reported that a vote-fraud-enabling algorithm has been added to NY’s voter registration roll.

There’s news on the low-tech electoral-fraud front, too: 49 states are giving voter registration forms to migrants without proof of citizenship, we’re told.

As for the NY story, according to Jerome R. Corsi at American Thinker:

Dr. Andrew Paquette, who serves as research director of the all-volunteer citizens’ group New York Citizens Audit (NYCA), has proven that New York state’s voter registration roll now contains an algorithm designed to facilitate election fraud.

One must understand how voter registration data works to appreciate just how serious this is. All registration data is predicated on algorithms, which are basically equations added into the registration in chronological sequence to transform a voter identification number (“Voter ID No.”) into a code. In an honest system, the voter who registers first gets Voter ID No. 1, the second voter to register gets Voter ID No. 2, etc. In other words, there’s a direct correlation between the date order of registration and the ID No., with the ID Nos. increasing by increments of one.

However, Dr. Paquette has discovered a different algorithm. This one changes the Voter ID No. assignment so that the ID Nos. no longer increase by increments of one that are tied to the order in which voters register. Instead, the ID Nos. appear scrambled, with no linear sequential order.

Why would someone do this?

To begin, please understand that altering voter registration data with an algorithm is prima facie evidence that someone committed a crime. In an honest world, voter registration rolls are supposed to be honest. When criminals who want to commit election fraud control state boards of election, any algorithm that’s added to the voter registration database to alter the orderly flow of accessible information is presumptively fraudulent.

You can read more about how this sausage is made here and here. But Corsi sums up the deception for us, writing:

• This particular Spiral Cipher scheme would appear to explain why bad actors want to suspend vote tabulations on election nights when a preferred candidate is losing.
• During the tabulation pause, they can obtain enough of the mail-in ballots with fraudulent SBOEIDs [State Board of Election Nos.] to throw the election.
• When tabulation resumes, the preferred candidate will suddenly overtake the opponent, a pattern that can be repeated until the election is a lock for the preferred candidate. The election fraud would be difficult to challenge legally precisely because the fraudulent mail-in votes were certifiable.

Far more prosaic but also Republic-threatening is the facilitation of migrant voting. As the New York Post reports on this front:

Welfare offices and other agencies in 49 US states are providing voter registration forms to migrants without requiring proof of citizenship, leading Republicans and conservatives to call for swift federal action to stop the handouts.

Every state but Arizona — which recently passed a law barring the practice on state but not federal forms — gives applicants for either welfare benefits, driver’s licenses, or in some cases, mail-in ballots voter registration forms without demanding proof of citizenship.

There is currently no requirement on federal voting forms to provide proof of US citizenship, though it is illegal to falsely claim one is a citizen or for a non-citizen to cast a ballot in a federal election.

But millions of migrants with humanitarian parole, refugee or asylum status are eligible for benefits that would bring them to the offices where voter registration takes place.

Of course, we’re still supposed to believe 2020 saw The Most Secure Election in American History™, and it will only cease being so if the Democrats “win” in November and 2024’s contest becomes The Most Secure Election in American History™.

Many Americans, however, aren’t buying this, which is why a 2021 poll found that a majority of “U.S. voters believe cheating impacted the 2020 election results.” As to what convinced them, consider the following headlines:

• “Democrat Operative Admits: We’ve Been Rigging Elections ‘for 50 Years.’”
• “Democrat Operative ADMITS: We’ve Been Committing MASSIVE Mail-in Vote Fraud for Decades.”
• “Democrat Election Commissioner Caught on Camera Admits: ‘There Is a Lot of Vote Fraud.’”
• “Stolen Republic: Citizens Group Uncovers MASSIVE Voter Irregularities in Dem-run State.”
• “L.A. Times Admits Illegals/Foreigners Influenced Election — to Help Democrats.”
• “Free and Fair Elections? Democrat Accuses Other Democrats of Vote Fraud in Mississippi.”
• “Voter Fraud: Pennsylvania Democrats Caught Throwing Out Trump Votes.”
• “Shocking New Poll Points to Reality of MASSIVE 2020 Vote Fraud.”
• “Mail-in Vote Fraud? THOUSANDS of Ballots May Be Missing in Just ONE County.”

Of course, we’re expected to pretend this isn’t going on — and the pseudo-elites do thus pretend. And the following 30-second video, from legendary 1942 film Casablanca, illustrates the pretense well.

Likewise, our Captain Renault pseudo-elites were shocked — shocked(!) — to find last Thursday that Joe Biden was cognitively impaired. By gum, they’d no idea!

In this vein, all the real insiders, i.e., connected politicians, know our electoral system is integrity-impaired. But they pretend otherwise because it benefits them.

And if and when the fraud becomes impossible to deny in a given instance, they will be shocked, shocked(!) again as they make believe they’re going to do something about it. The difference is manners:

Unlike Renault, when they accept their (election) winnings, don’t expect them to say “Thank you very much.”

                   This article was originally published at The New American.