UN Declares War on ‘Climate Skeptics’, Unveils Massive War Chest to Control Narrative in Legacy Media

This latest scheme, dubbed the Global Initiative for Information Integrity on Climate Change, was announced at the G20 Summit in Brazil, and is financially backed by countries including the United Kingdom, France, and Sweden as well as international institutions including the UN and WEF.

According to UNESCO, the new initiative will “bring together countries, international organizations, and stakeholders worldwide,” and “aims to promote and defend information integrity on climate change, address disinformation, and enhance climate change awareness and action.”

Notably, the initiative includes a substantial war chest designed to fund legacy media outlets, ensuring they promote the narratives favored by the global elite.

“It includes a global fund which will finance research into disinformation on climate change and initiatives to promote information integrity,” the UNESCO report continues.

Let’s be real: this isn’t about “truth” or “science”—it’s about control.

This initiative is a blatant power grab, aimed at silencing anyone who dares to question the elite’s lucrative climate crisis narrative.

Under the guise of combating so-called “misinformation,” global elites are waging an all-out war on free speech, determined to shut down dissent and crush open debate.

Wattsupwiththat reports: This isn’t just an attack on skeptics—it’s a direct assault on the principles of free thought and the foundation of public discourse.

According to their public statements, the Initiative seeks to fund nonprofits for “research” and “public awareness campaigns.” They’re also creating what they call an “international research network” to identify and suppress so-called disinformation. In other words, they’re building an apparatus to label opposing viewpoints as dangerous lies and to justify censoring them into oblivion.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres, with his characteristic paternalism, declared disinformation a threat to climate action and even democracy itself.

“We must also take on climate disinformation,” Guterres said. “Our climate is at a breaking point.”

The not-so-subtle subtext? If you dare question their agenda, you are the problem.

This isn’t the first time climate skeptics have been targeted. As far back as 2010, Google began manipulating search results to demote skeptical voices.

A French study highlighted how skeptics dominated online search rankings at the time, leading to a concerted effort to bury their views beneath mountains of alarmist propaganda. Blogs like Pensée Unique and works by Claude Allègre drew enough attention to provoke the ire of the establishment.

Now, thanks to collusion between Big Tech, governments, and nonprofits, the “censorship-industrial-complex” has become a powerful and insidious force. Groups like the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) in the United States, along with private entities like NewsGuard, routinely conspire to flag, suppress, and delegitimize dissenting voices.

We’ve seen this play out before. The Twitter Files laid bare the extent of this collusion, revealing how social media platforms partnered with government agencies to suppress stories and deplatform users who strayed from the approved narrative. This is not about protecting the public from falsehoods—it’s about eliminating debate.

The global elites are terrified of one thing: losing control. Despite decades of propaganda, public skepticism about catastrophic climate change has grown. Every failed prediction—from the “ice-free Arctic” to collapsing polar bear populations—chips away at their credibility. And with each new report showing the astronomical costs of Net Zero policies, more people are asking whether the so-called cure is worse than the disease.

Rather than answer these legitimate questions, the climate establishment resorts to silencing its critics. They know their models are flawed, their data cherry-picked, and their policy prescriptions ruinous. Yet instead of reevaluating their position, they double down on censorship.

This isn’t just a theoretical exercise. The consequences of suppressing climate skepticism are real and devastating. Policies like the Green New Deal and Net Zero come with enormous costs—both economically and socially. Entire industries are being dismantled, energy prices are skyrocketing, and developing nations are being strong-armed into abandoning affordable fossil fuels.

Meanwhile, the so-called solutions—wind turbines, solar panels, and electric vehicles—are riddled with problems, from unreliable energy output to massive environmental destruction. But pointing out these inconvenient truths now makes you a target of international suppression.

Make no mistake: this is a battle for the soul of free inquiry. If the climate alarmists succeed in silencing dissent, the consequences will extend far beyond climate policy. The precedent being set is clear: disagree with the elite consensus, and you will be erased.