Verdict for Trucker, Harold Honker is set for today

One of the most decent, hard working, law abiding men who had been targeted by Carney/Trudeau’s gang of state thugs at the end of the Freedom Convoy and tried for “mischief”, which appears to be the same kind of ccatch-all charge in Canada as it is in Islam, is set to be handed down today.

Harold granted us an interview when he was at court in May of 2024 and that interview is at the bottom of this post. Please take a few minutes to watch for a clear impression of who this true blooded Canadian patriot and man of principle that he is.

Here is the text of an email sent out by former Canadian Conservative MP, and then independent MP Derek Sloan after the Conservative Party ejected him for being Conservative:

Harold Jonker’s criminal trial for protesting at the Ottawa Freedom Convoy has concluded and his verdict will be handed down today!

Please take a moment to pray for Harold that justice will be done.

Harold is charged with 4 criminal charges, including mischief and intimidation. Harold is a hard-working, patriotic Canadian and a trucking business co-owner. He has never been on the wrong side of the law – until now.

As Niagara Captain for the 2022 Ottawa Freedom Convoy he led 12 of his own company’s trucks, along with countless others into Ottawa, and the truck he was driving was the first official Truck to enter Ottawa for the Convoy. He played a strong leadership role at the Convoy and was part of the unofficial leadership team there. He did many of the mainstream media interviews for the convoy because of his background in politics, including as a town councillor. Many say he was a big part of the critical “glue” that kept things together, and kept things peaceful (at least on the part of the protestors).

Of course, that means the government is targeting him, and he is fighting 4 criminal charges that carry potential jail time with them.

Regardless of what happens today, Harold needs your help.

To help Harold defend himself, click below:

https://www.convergepay.com/hosted-payments/?ssl_txn_auth_token=zh2Yd8NNR3W%2FW3VM0Wbq5QAAAZASnFRn#!/payment-method

The trial lasted 3 days and went about 7 hours each day. Harold wanted to take the stand in his own defence but was advised against it as the Crown’s evidence was weak.

Harold got the final word though, when the Crown as part of their evidence played interviews of Harold where he spoke about God and his love, and described the Convoy as loving, peaceful and joyful with no violence.

This was as powerful a testimony as he could have given.

Screenshot

At the end of the trial the judge asked the Crown to explain when the Convoy went from “legal” to “illegal” as the protest was booked beforehand, police parked them, police were working with them, etc. The Crown could not explain this satisfactorily.

Hopefully, this is a positive indication.

Previously the Crown offered Harold 1 year house arrest if he agreed to plead guilty. As a man of integrity, Harold refused. Now they’re asking for a year in prison.

Putting a law-abiding, business owning Canadian in jail for one year because he attended a peaceful protest, coordinated with the Ottawa Police, is absolutely scandalous.

He also led the Convoy to remain peaceful when forces conspired against them to break their patience and try to create violence.

This day of reckoning is tremendously important.

Having talked to many of the people charged with proxy-crimes for openly defying illegal state narratives, and having seen many of the days of court-hearings as well as hearings by the CPSO the Ottawa Police against Helen Grus, when none of them actually did anything that was not standard operating procedure anytime in Canada’s history prior to 2020, we can learn a few things about the state of law and power in Canada and elsewhere across the Western World.

The facts about the vaccine, being that it was dangerous and fully innefective which are now common knowledge, even amongst some of its strongest proponents like say, Scott Adams. But it took a fatal diagnosis for him to admit it.

I should mention that Scott Adam’s book, God’s Debris is one of the most enjoyable books I have ever read and am so grateful for it. Maybe not for everyone, but for those that it reaches, it is a wonderful uplifting read.

Below, Scott, who was at odds with all of those of us who opposed the Covid Vaxx admits after a fashion that he was wrong about it.

It is still not quite an admission of being wrong as he paints it as luck on the part of those of us that didn’t take the vaxx. Just that we were right and he was wrong, but he was still the better thinker than we were, and even though he was wrong he was still kinda right cause the info available at the time indicated taking it.

No. It did not. I would bet my doctor and scientist and statistician friend’s data against his reasoning that at the time, the information we had was that it was insane to take experimental gene therapy to prevent a disease that really just took a few months of life away from the very elderly and fragile. Less serious than the flu. Even in the legacy strain. Nobel Prize winners in medicine were saying the same thing at the time.

But the point is that it doesn’t matter who was right or who was wrong about the vaxx. Even if it worked, and even if it saved lives, the issue is one of individual rights. The Covid years was a communist revolution where they eliminated those rights to the point where parents don’t have the right to ask their children not to be surgically mutilated and sterilized until they are old enough to legally get a tattoo. (Bill C-4)

Where you can have your career destroyed for refusing a clearly dangerous ‘treatment’ or worse, if you fail to enforce that ‘treatment’ on others. Before Covid, the national slogan for Canadians was “Get a second opinion”. After 2020 you could not even get a first one. All opinions doctors have are by the state. A doctor who gives you his personal medical advice based on science and his own experience is risking his career. But if he kills you with state directives, there are no negative consequences. he did what he was supposed to do, which was in fact ‘all he could do to save you’.

Harold is a Canadian patriot, a family man, and an unusually principled man, much like Helen Gruz is an unusually principled woman and Ottawa police officer. She was found guilty after a show trial where every conceivable device, even childish ones was used to create the desired Guilty verdict. Devices like like not turning on the sound system so in-house witnesses could actually hear what was being said, and talking very low in the hearing room. (At one point I heard the hearing officer actually speaking normally as you would in a room that size and catching himself, then quieted himself down so it was difficult to hear him.) But there was a dozen or more dirty tricks like that used to get the inevitable guilty verdict despite no evidence of wrongdoing and a lot of evidence of a biased court and procedure.

So we know what the verdict will be, because the system no longer operates based on evidence, rule of law, or reason. it operates to create a political outcome for the endless shift to the left.