What does ‘controlled opposition’ mean anyway?

This post is for Canadians, and anyone interested in Canada, or anyone in a system of government where leaders are picked using a similar system to Canada, either by intention or in reality.

First, let’s watch this video by Runkle of the Bailey on the Conservative Party legislation on self defence in the home against intruders.

The punch line is the CPC is pretending to enforce laws to allow defence of the self and the home while keeping it exactly the same.

Then we add this. Remember, one of the communist plays is to remove all power from parents over Children, unless you want to kill them before birth, and give all that power to the state.

That power would extend to the point where a state agent, say a socialist teacher, could persuade your child that they are born in the wrong body, but their body can be adjusted to be more like how they imagine themselves to be, and embark them on a course of radical surgeries and drugs that will mutilate and sterilize them for life no matter what else they ever do. The Conservatives accelerated a bill that would have the parents made criminal if they attempted to even suggest to their own young children that they delayed such a set of procedures till they were old enough to buy a beer, vote or get a pack of cigarettes.

Here is video of Parliament where the Conservatives ask to skip all the damn hullabaloo around bill C-4 and just pass it already without all that ceremonial reading of it, and pesky voting and so on.

My Google searches used to turn up an excellent US Library of Congress summary of the Canadian bill C-4 which was dialectically named, ‘Anti-conversion therapy’ legislation when in fact it was as conversion therapy as you can possibly get. Tricking people into becoming a simulacrum of the other sex and criminalizing parents who tried to stop it. It seems Google won’t give mt that result anymore. But Brave’s built in search engine will. 

Overall, the actions of the Conservative Party increasingly appear to be those of, not people who wish the restoration of something like a Republic.

Probably most obviously would be how the Liberal of Canada is bringing in Millions of people very alien to Canadian values and culture, and the Conservative Party seems to want to build them houses, rather than deport them, and restore immigration to something that works in Canadian interests, rather than for the ‘migrants’ at the expense of Canadian interests. Not to mention they seem to want to build these illegal immigrants homes at public expense.

So maybe we all need to think about what controlled opposition means to each of us, and decide if the Conservative Party fits.

If it does, some of us had better form a new party, or infiltrate and take over the Conservative one, and make it Conservative again.

MCPCA? MaCoPaCoAg? Make the Conservative Party Conservative again? Probably not possible. The few people in the party that tried got sidelined.

Remember the Conservative MP, Derrick Sloan, who held the largest attended and watched press conference in Canadian history during Covid? Kicked out of the party and not re elected.

This video was after he had already been removed from the party:

There are a few solid conservatives within the Conservative Party though. After the recent federal election, we published some speeches they made that were stellar in their unabashedly anti-communist content and clear awareness of the situation Canada is in now.

Those are all new members. Leslyn Lewis was always a solid Canadian Conservative and always had the courage to say out loud what needs to be done. She also was the only Conservative MP that I am aware of, to support the Freedom Convoy. She also very rightly suggested Canada leave the United Nations.

So maybe there is a feint hope for a political solution from the CPC. But not from the top.

Source: https://vladtepesblog.com/2025/09/24/what-does-controlled-opposition-mean-anyway/