On learning to see through the lies of the communist state with easy examples given: Links 1 for January 18, 2026

I am currently re-watching the excellent miniseries, Chernobyl. Frankly, it should be shown in every school above grade 10. It is a brilliant depiction of a dialectically run society, where lies that support state narratives are rewarded by the apparatchiks even while reality kills them for it in real time. Meanwhile, those who attempted to save up to a million lives with the truth were summarily punished. Also in real time. And often sent to their deaths to confirm the lie.

I would hope that a lot of people would watch it carefully, thinking about some of the mass line narrative attacks over the past few decades, with the Covid and Vaxx narratives being first and foremost as a comparator.
We can also use this measuring stick to determine just how communist, meaning operating dialectically as opposed to on truth, a nation is by its tenaciousness to the narrative, or if it pivots to a reality based and responsibility driven set of facts and consequences. Did the people who did damage by perpetrating the narrative get identified and punished? A republic. Does the state maintain the narrative attack and maybe even double down? Communist.

1. Canadian schools in Ontario double down on mRNA injections with social and legal consequences for the ‘vaccine hesitant’.

2. This is Runkle of the Bailey on the actions of the Canadian State. It is 45 minutes, but this gentlemen is one of the few worth the time. He explains that in the wake of the State losing its case in appeals court over the Emergency Measures Act used against peaceful protestors demanding the right to maintain their rights as guaranteed in law, they are now moving ahead to take everyone’s guns. While these two things may seem unrelated on the surface, once one takes a Telos based analysis, and to understand the communist state there is no other kind that yields an actual explanation for state policy, it becomes clear how they are related. The courts have determined the state had no right to do what it did to eliminate rights, and now the state wants to make sure no one can defend their individualism in any way that might actually be a real threat to total state power. In other words, anything that even rhymes with the intention of the US 2nd amendment.

Also note that like “hate speech” or “hate crimes” the state reserves the right to define it as they need to for any given case. At least equally noteworthy, the state picked someone who knows little to nothing about the issue for which he was put in charge. Experts after all, tend to resist destructive policies that actually work against the stated purpose. So communists generally pick the ignorant and the. grateful or the job types who do what they are told. In extremis, this would be like picking someone with a graphic arts degree as the minister of health during a ‘pandemic’ where the most illiberal and draconian anti-freedom measures ever enacted in Canada.

3. We still live in an era where institutions cover the catastrophic results of their policies with official truths. The response has been for people like me and sites like this to push back with anything we can find that supports our own beliefs about the nature of reality as we reason it to be, or even experience it ourselves. This twigs back to the miniseries, Chernobyl. Really, if you can, try and book the time to find and watch it. Its riveting entertainment as well as a 1984 calibre education on communist processes.

Meanwhile, we try and educate ourselves and each other about the various cancer, cardiac and reproductive consequences of the mRNA Covid shots. And while many papers are now finding their way into peer reviewed publications, well try asking Chat GPT or Grok about cancer and heart disease after the mRNA shots and see what you get. It’s an ideological white wash. If you show evidence that is not peer reviewed, it will object that it is not peer reviewed., If you show evidence that is, then Peer review is no longer an acceptable standard and it defaults to consensus.. Consensus of course, is the epitome of anti-science itself:

Chat GPT says:

4. What the scientific community does acknowledge

Without weighing in on individual anecdotes — which are valuable at the human level but not scientific evidence — here’s what the peer-reviewed literature actually says:

? Vaccines reduce risk of severe COVID outcomes

Even with waning immunity against infection, data from multiple countries shows vaccines reduce the risk of severe disease and death compared to unvaccinated populations.

There is of course, no such thing as “the scientific community” within the realm of actual science. In fact that is consensus science, which is anti science. When pressed on that, GPT admitted the truth of it. Science is about a falsifiable theory. If there is a consensus that has zero to do with it being true or untrue. It just means the people who are considered scientists were asked, and agreed with the proposition. It means exactly ZERO beyond that.

GPT:

Yes — on that point, we’re in full alignment.

What you’re objecting to isn’t science; it’s the rhetorical substitution of “consensus” for inquiry. And you’re right: that substitution is anti-scientific in the strict sense.

A few precise distinctions help make this clear.

There is no sense other than the strict sense if we are trying to get scientific truth.

And so we come to cancer and the mRNA shots:

Looking for a link to the hundreds of studies but here are a couple supplied in the Twitter thread:

PubMed COVID-19 vaccination, all-cause mortality, and hospitalization for cancer: 30-month cohort study in an Italian province

Pubmed: 1-year risks of cancers associated with COVID-19 vaccination: a large population-based cohort study in South Korea

These are cautious studies which one would expect with Peer Review material. But the thing one may ask oneself is, at this point we all know someone who is vaxx injured. So how rare can it be? One of the devices used to cover for all this I think is the admission that certain things like myocarditis can happen but it’s extremely rare. So those who suffer from it, or know someone who has can imagine themselves to be a kind of Hell’s lottery ticker winner where they reluctantly admit that yeah, there is an issue but it doesn’t dismantle main thesis of safe and effective just because a tiny minority of the population has/had an adverse effect. But I don’t know anyone who doesn’t know anyone who has suffered a major health crisis that is counter-intuitive after one or another dose of the mRNA shots. So while we MUST always examine what we see that we like for confirmation bias, and yes we have to do that because our enemies in the information warfare arena load our social media ecosystem with disinformation specifically to overweight our own confirmation bias with pure manure, we also have to try and keep a space in our heads where our own lived reality has to be reconciled with what we are told it is. This will mean long periods of not knowing a thing. This is a condition most people find very difficult to live with. But to know what is true, its one we have to learn to accept.

4. I don’t know what city this was in. But it is for sure the most overt statement of the real purpose of these protests. Quite refreshing in one way, terrifying in another. Having covered a LOT of these kinds of protests myself, most of this intent was always there, but one had to read at least part way between the lines. “From the River to Turtle Island” (North America) etc. One gets the idea this is about the defeat of Western Civilization altogether. Now it’s being stated.

If anyone knows which city this was, please post in comment.

5. Western COMINTERN government continue to do what some might call sociological experiments with the legacy populations of Western nations. I would not call it an experiment anymore than adding a tablespoon of Nestle’s Quick to milk is an experiment. The results are clearly known in advance from millions of repetitions.

The DM article is here. 

Terrified Dutch students made to live side-by-side with 125 refugees to aid their ‘integration’ were subjected to years of sexual assault and violence, an investigation has reported.

Stek Oost, located in the Watergraafsmeer district of Amsterdam, was sold to the Netherlands as the dream solution to the housing and refugee crisis.

A total of 125 students and 125 refugees would live alongside each other, and were even encouraged to ‘buddy up’ so the migrants would adapt to life in the Netherlands more quickly.

But students living there told Dutch investigative documentary programme Zembla they faced multiple sexual assaults, harassment, violence, stalking and even claimed a gang rape had taken place.

One woman said she would regularly see ‘fights in the hallway and then again in the shared living room’.

A man told the programme that a refugee threatened him with an eight-inch kitchen knife.

And they claimed they were ignored despite filing multiple reports to authorities.

In one shocking case, a former resident said that a Syrian raped her after inviting her to his room to watch a film then refusing to let her leave.

The woman, identified only as Amanda, said: ‘He wanted to learn Dutch, to get an education. I wanted to help him.’

What we can know is, every word of the government explanation of why they did this was a lie.

Thank you all for checking out this site.

Source: https://vladtepesblog.com/2026/01/18/on-learning-to-see-through-the-lies-of-the-communist-state-with-easy-examples-given-links-1-for-january-18-2026/