Pro-Terror Extremist Voters: Third Parties

Pro-Terror Extremist Voters in the U.S. Election (full series)
Harris | Trump | Third Parties
Pro-Terrorism Voters

---

Categories 3-5: Third Parties

The third, fourth and fifth categories believe that voting for third parties is the most principled and strategically wise choice.

The Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL) represented by De la Cruz is the most outwardly pro-Hamas, anti-American, and Marxist of the third parties mentioned. The group literally endorsed the October 7 terrorist attacks on Israel and openly roots for the governments of Iran, Syria, China, Russia, North Korea, Venezuela, and Cuba to prevail over the U.S., Israel, the West, and the West’s allies. She has yet to score even 1 percent support in recent national and swing state polls.

The other two choices are Jill Stein of the Green Party and Cornel West of the Justice For All Party. Stein shockingly chose an openly pro-Hamas running mate, Butch Ware, who celebrated the October 7 terrorist attacks. West and his running mate, Melina Abdullah, refuse to condemn Hamas.

Stein and West have both arguably justified the October 7 attacks. The most generous, bending-over-backwards interpretation of their remarks would still have to concede that they, at the very least, victim-blame Israel for the occurrence of the atrocities.

Stein referred to the attacks as acts of “resistance,” a term with positive connotations that imply self-defense and, therefore, legitimate and justifiable bloodshed. She did not refer to them as acts of terrorism, war crimes, atrocities, human rights abuses, or other language with negative connotations. She wrote, “When a murderous occupation makes peaceful resistance impossible, it makes violent resistance inevitable.”

Similarly, West characterized the Hamas-led terrorist attacks on October 7 as a counter-terrorist operation.

Stein is a more popular choice for the pro-terrorism seditionist voters, although some are choosing West due to her favorable behavior toward the Syrian, Iranian, and Russian dictators. She has particularly been criticized for a post that advocated for the U.S. to help Assad and his Iranian and Russian sponsors take back complete control of Syria, which she has since deleted and apologized for.

The Abandon Harris campaign, which is led by Islamist extremists who support Hamas and is organized by the Civil Rights Alliance for America, has endorsed Stein.

Its director, Hassan Abdel Salam, says he was “detained and tortured” by Israel for 23 days in 2002 after he “publicly called for the liberation of Palestine.” Abandon Harris co-founder and Minnesota chair, Jaylani Hussein, is also the executive director of the state’s Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) chapter. CAIR’s national executive director cheered the October 7 attacks, and the group has a history of links to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Another co-founder and its former Michigan co-chair, Khalid Turaani, was chosen as the executive director of CAIR’s Ohio chapter’s Columbus and Cincinnati subsections. He expressed joy over the October 7 attacks with a honorific graphic, praised Hamas’s holding of an Israeli brigadier-general as a hostage and glorified PFLP terrorist group spokesman Ghassan Kanafani.

At least two of Abandon Harris’s official ambassadors, Omar Suleiman and Tom Facchine, expressed support for Hamas after the October 7 attacks. A third, Mobeen Vaid, engages in hate speech against the LGBT community and complains that religious communities “have largely collapsed at the altar of homosexuality and are quickly proving incapable of resisting transgenderism, too.” He also explains that part of his respect for Hamas is because it supports the death penalty for people who are not straight.

The American Muslim 2024 Election Task Force endorses voting for either Stein or West. The coalition consists of the 501(c)(4) advocacy arms of the pro-Hamas Islamist groups CAIR, American Muslims for Palestine, Muslim American Society, the Islamic Circle of North America and another coalition called the U.S. Council of Muslim Organizations. The final member is a group named Muslim Civic Coalition—Activate.

There are also pro-Hamas white nationalists who are voting for Stein and West. The most prominent example is former Knights of the Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard and Louisiana House of Representatives member from 1989-1992, David Duke.

He endorsed Jill Stein because “she’s the only candidate who speaks clearly against the war in the Middle East.” Voting for her is, in his words, “good for white people, Europeans, as well as all humanity.” She quickly rejected his endorsement and condemned white nationalism.

Categories 6-8: Delegitimize the Process

The final three categories are pro-terrorism extremists who are eligible voters but have chosen not to exercise their right to vote. These citizens believe that voting provides legitimacy to a political system that should be delegitimized and overthrown or that voting in this particular election is an unprincipled action.

Within this camp, there are three types of nonvoters: Those who believe the outcome makes no difference and both major party candidates are equally detestable capitalist, colonialist, Zionist puppets; those who hope that Harris wins; and those who hope that Trump wins.

---

In the next installment, pro-terrorism supporters can credibly claim to be responsible for the outcome it it’s a close election.

Source: https://capitalresearch.org/article/pro-terror-extremist-voters-part-3/