MEDIA JIHAD: 150 News Outlets to Stage Anti-Israel Campaign Coordinated by NGOs, Leaked Docs Show

A leaked document exposes a global antisemitic media blitz set for today.

150 outlets across 50 countries, including, Al Jazeera, are conspiring to push pre-written scripts, graphics & hashtags to falsely paint Israel as targeting journalists.
Remember this when you hear pundits, ‘experts’ and other assorted clowns blame Israel for their bad PR image image and how they are not doing enough to enhance their public image.

Israel Foreign Ministry: When 150 media outlets choose in a synchronized manner to stop reporting news, to throw values of the press and plurality of opinions into the trash, and instead publish a uniform, pre-scripted political manifesto against Israel – that tells you how great the bias against Israel is in the global media.

The reports we see in the global media regarding Gaza do not tell the real story there. They tell the campaign of lies that Hamas spreads.

This is not journalism. This is politics.

Independent media died the moment 150 outlets agreed to read the same script 150 media outlets 50 countries. 1 script. This isn’t journalism – it’s PR jihad. @deborahturness @bbcnews
J’Accuse: Coordinated Media Propaganda Against Israel pic.twitter.com/slkruZQME9

— Dame BillieSt Unit 8200 (@somesayparsley) August 31, 2025

LEAKED Document in comments below

This is f*cking insane!

150 media outlets reportedly part of co-ordinated effort set to push Gazan “journalist” campaign tomorrow – 1st September 2025 all instructed to vilify Israel.

This isn’t journalism. This is manipulation. pic.twitter.com/BnKGgmhUQi

— Kosher (@koshercockney) August 31, 2025

When 150 media outlets choose in a synchronized manner to stop reporting news, to throw values of the press and plurality of opinions into the trash, and instead publish a uniform, pre-scripted political manifesto against Israel – that tells you how great the bias against Israel… pic.twitter.com/TqLlyREudN

— Israel Foreign Ministry (@IsraelMFA) September 1, 2025

J’ACCUSE!

Never before in modern history have 150 media outlets across 50 nations marched in lockstep, publishing one banner, one script, one slogan. Not for Ukraine. Not for Syria. Not for the Uyghurs. Only for the Jews — only against Israel. On… pic.twitter.com/ooGrrtdiu7

— Maccabi Lev-Ari (@Maccabi226km) August 31, 2025

It begins:

The campaign’s central claim that “at least 210 journalists have been killed by the Israeli military” lacks crucial context that has emerged from military intelligence sources and independent investigations. Analysis of individual cases reveals numerous instances where individuals classified as “journalists” maintained dual roles as combatants or terror operatives.

For example, Al Jazeera reporter Anas al-Sharif, who was killed in an Israeli airstrike earlier this month, was revealed by IDF intelligence to be a member of Hamas. Similarly, Abdullah Al-Jamal, a correspondent for the Palestine Chronicle, was likewise a Hamas terrorist who held three Israelis captive in his home following their abduction on October 7th.

150 Media Outlets to Stage Anti-Israel Campaign Coordinated by NGOs, Leaked Docs Show

By: Jewish Insider, August 31, 2025:

Critics argue that outlets operating based on pre-written scripts, standardized templates, coordinated global timing, and unified hashtags, represents the antithesis of independent journalism

Update Sept. 1, 2025: The full campaign strategy document referenced in this article can be accessed here.

A leaked strategic document has exposed a coordinated international media campaign designed to pressure news outlets into publishing synchronized anti-Israel content on September 1st, meant to inaccurately portray Israel as systematically targeting journalists in Gaza and barring press freedom.

The campaign, orchestrated by Reporters Without Borders (RSF) and advocacy group Avaaz, involves approximately 150 media outlets across 50 countries in what organizers describe as a “world-first” coordinated newsroom action. According to the Hamas-tied Palestinian Information Center, outlets that signed on include: “Al Jazeera, The Independent, +972, Local Call, The Intercept, Mediapart, L’Humanité, Forbidden Stories, il Fatto Quotidiano, El País, RTVE, Daraj, Mada Masr, Le Desk, and L’Orient-Le Jour (Lebanon), along with numerous outlets across Europe, Latin America, Africa, and Asia.”

The leaked documents reveal what many argue represents the antithesis of independent journalism. Rather than organic editorial decisions, participating outlets are provided with pre-written scripts and messaging; standardized visual assets and templates; coordinated timing across global time zones; and unified hashtag campaigns.

The Campaign Strategy Revealed

According to the campaign document titled “Global Media Join Forces In a World-First for Press Freedom in Gaza,” participating outlets are instructed to display unified messaging claiming: “At the rate journalists are being killed in Gaza by the Israeli army, there will soon be no one left to keep you informed.” The document provides detailed instructions for different media types:

Print publications: Front pages entirely or partially black with unified messaging

Online publications: Black banners with coordinated messaging linking to RSF press releases

Broadcasters: Scripted statements over black screens or with metronome sounds

The campaign includes materials translated into nine languages: English, Arabic, Hebrew, French, German, Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Japanese, and Chinese, indicating its global scope and ambition.

The Campaign’s False Premise

The campaign’s central claim that “at least 210 journalists have been killed by the Israeli military” lacks crucial context that has emerged from military intelligence sources and independent investigations. Analysis of individual cases reveals numerous instances where individuals classified as “journalists” maintained dual roles as combatants or terror operatives.

For example, Al Jazeera reporter Anas al-Sharif, who was killed in an Israeli airstrike earlier this month, was revealed by IDF intelligence to be a member of Hamas. Similarly, Abdullah Al-Jamal, a correspondent for the Palestine Chronicle, was likewise a Hamas terrorist who held three Israelis captive in his home following their abduction on October 7th.

Writing in the Wall Street Journal on August 21, James Kirchick explained that:

“Of the 192 putative journalists on the CPJ [Committee to Protect Journalists] list, 26 were employed by or freelanced for Al-Aqsa TV, which the committee generously describes as ‘Hamas-affiliated.’ Nineteen were employed by Al-Quds Al-Youm, which the State Department says is ‘run by Islamic Jihad,’ and seven worked for Palestine Today, which the CPJ itself calls ‘pro-Islamic Jihad.’ Six worked for Al Mayadeen or Al-Manar, the former affiliated with and the latter owned by Hezbollah, and another 23 worked for outlets connected to terrorist groups ranging from Hamas and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine to the Houthis. Not counting those the IDF has accused of being terrorists themselves—including Sharif—nearly half the people on the committee’s list worked for media owned by or affiliated with terrorist organizations.”

Historical Context Challenges “Unprecedented” Claims

The campaign’s assertion that Israel’s restrictions on journalist access are “without precedent in modern warfare” is contradicted by multiple historical examples. Military forces have regularly restricted media access during urban combat operations, citing operational security and civilian safety concerns. U.S. forces enforced extensive media restrictions during the 2004 Fallujah assault, effectively blocking independent coverage of key phases. Throughout the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (2001-2021), U.S. and NATO forces regularly implemented access restrictions through controlled embedding systems that limited independent journalist movement.

Under International Humanitarian Law, military commanders possess legal authority to restrict media access when journalists’ presence could compromise operational security, expose troop movements, or increase civilian harm.

Read the whole thing….