More Than 85 Climate (cult) Scientists Whine About Trump Admin Climate Report

Suddenly, it is not OK to have some errors and “cherry picking” and stuff

More than 85 climate experts say Energy Department report on greenhouse gases is “full of errors”

An international group of more than 85 climate experts on Tuesday published a 439-page review arguing that a report by the Trump administration’s Energy Department fails to “adequately represent the current scientific understanding of climate change,” and it “exhibits pervasive problems” by misrepresenting scientific literature and cherry-picking data.

The Department of Energy’s 151-page report, “A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate,” was written by five authors who were hand-selected by Energy Secretary Chris Wright, a former fossil fuel executive. It included a controversial conclusion that “carbon dioxide-induced warming appears to be less damaging economically than commonly believed,” and it states that “aggressive mitigation strategies” to address greenhouse gas emissions “could be more harmful than beneficial” — a statement that supports the oil and gas industry. (snip)

“Climate science is probably one of the most robust and scrutinized scientific fields in the history of science because of the economic implications,” said Andrew Dessler, director of the Texas Center for Extreme Weather at Texas A&M University, who felt the report made “a mockery of science.” (snip)

In less than a month, Dessler helped organize more than 85 international climate experts, mostly from universities, from the United States, Europe, Asia, Australia and Canada, who voluntarily reviewed the DOE report and found that it was “full of errors,” “biased” and “not fit to inform policy.”

This is laughable. The entire doomsday cult rests upon a bed of lies, misrepresentation, faulty data, and cultish thinking. It’s not a mockery of science, it’s just not science. It begins with the presumption that Mankind is at fault via its use of fossil fuels, and then they generate the data to support this, the exact opposite of how science and the scientific method works.

Dessler and his colleagues are not the only ones who are concerned about the DOE report and its findings. The American Meteorological Society also published its own response, finding “five foundational flaws” that it says “places the report at odds with scientific principles and practices.”

If things are so bad, why are all these Warmists using vast amounts of fossil fuels and energy in their own lives?

The post More Than 85 Climate (cult) Scientists Whine About Trump Admin Climate Report appeared first on Pirate’s Cove.