The Great Replacement Theory

By Ray DiLorenzo

Americans want America, not a bastardized version of it.

Many people believe in a theory or conspiracy that has been circulating lately. This conspiracy has been around since at least 2010, since Renaud Camus, a French writer, first published it in a book. Simply stated, the theory suggests that there is a plot by the Left to diminish the influence of white people around the world, particularly in Western nations.

The subject has actually been around since 1965, when Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. The Act made major changes to immigration in the United States, allowing a more diverse population. No longer did we give preference to Northern and Western Europeans. Kennedy was gone; Johnson, one of the most partisan presidents, took the opportunity and went with it.

Since at least Lyndon Johnson, the contemporary inner workings of the Democrat Party are, by any measure, treasonous.

You could say that we stopped searching for engineers and doctors, among others, who could make significant contributions, and instead began looking for future needy Democrats. These Dems would be coerced into continually voting for Democrats lest they lose their handouts.

Since that legislation passed, our population has nearly doubled. That is not the entire problem. The main issue is the new immigrants’ origins, culture, and identity. These factors can lead to challenges in integration and social cohesion because vastly different cultural practices and values clash with established norms. In our case, the established norms are Western values.

The melting pot in America requires assimilation. Muslims in general do not assimilate; they dominate. We don’t want cultures that demand the cessation of church bells on Sunday morning but require a loudspeaker call to prayer five times a day. We don’t want cultures in America that promote segregation or the establishment of separate towns or cities.

If you respect different cultures but would rather not live with a tribe from Papua New Guinea, the Left will label you a racist. The Left ignores this issue, even when it hits them in the head, rapes their women, or murders their children.

The Left appears to choose what they see as the ethical path, regardless of the potential consequences for their fellow Americans. These Democrats will ignore any inner feelings of deceit while Governor Pritzker or Mayor Johnson walks around Chicago with their security detail, out of view of cameras, telling us how safe their streets are. Mayor Johnson’s narrative comes first. The possibility that Trump, an outsider and Republican no less, will clean Chicago of crime will be too much for him or any Democrat to bear. Instead, they continue to promote policies that prioritize ideology over the safety and well-being of their constituents. This selective blindness raises sober questions about their commitment to genuine community welfare and accountability.

The Democrat Party’s extreme defensive stance was the most striking aspect of the 1965 bill. Many Americans were alarmed at the new law. People heard constantly that “the bill will not flood our cities with immigrants… It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause Americans to lose their jobs.” It did all of the above.

How else could we now have representatives in Congress who hate the country they represent?

When they know they’re wrong, they take an extreme defensive position, which leads to all the feared consequences.

When Biden became the pseudo president, the Democrat committee that took control over our country accelerated the program beyond anyone’s nightmare. It is no longer theory. It is a fact. The Democrats have been working from inside to diminish America as we know it.

For their purposes, which are still coming into focus, the Democrat Party decided to remake America into a different country, no longer hospitable to Americans, no longer expecting or demanding that immigrants be financially independent or assimilate into American society, but instead becoming a nation of tribes. As Charlie Kirk would say, adopting this approach guarantees civilizational suicide. Looking at Europe, it has become unrecognizable, a dying continent.

The Democrats took it upon themselves to change America to ensure that the voting outcomes were acceptable to them.

These are the people who keep telling you that democracy is in danger, but they will fix it.

The Great Replacement Theory is no theory. It is real. The Left loves to use racism as a way to deflect the real objective. The Democrats don’t like Americans, American culture, or the American way of life. And they want it gone! In Europe, Western culture is dying, and their leadership seems to lack the wisdom or the will to save it.

It becomes clear that the conversation surrounding the Great Replacement extends far beyond mere accusations of racism. This objection to ‘Replacement’ politics is rooted in nationalism, not racism. It has nothing to do with white privilege. It highlights a growing sentiment among those who feel that political maneuvers are reshaping America to suit the preferences of a select few.

The Democrats want you to believe what they say, not what you see. And we see it everywhere. A political party opened our borders to unvetted immigrants to dilute American culture and secure an untapped voter base for themselves. It’s this inclination to alter traditional American values and culture that is raising serious questions that challenge their commitment to the very democracy they profess to uphold.  The Great Replacement is a fact, no longer a theory.

The post The Great Replacement Theory appeared first on Stand up America US Foundation.