The Latest FAILED Trump Democrat Media Hoax

I’m loathe to waste ink on the Democrats’ latest Trump hoax (Epstein, again), but ignoring it only rewards the media machine that decides—for all of us—what counts as “news.” For more than half a century, the party of destruction has gripped the American narrative in a chokehold, tearing this once-great nation down brick by brick while their stenographers in the press nod along.

Now they’re at it again. Another fabrication, conjured out of thin air, and once more the entire media ecosystem snaps to attention, dutifully amplifying the lie they’ve been handed.

The Democrat-engineered government shutdown has been crushed but the media stooges aren’t talking about that. They blew up a lie that actually, in fact, expnerates President Trump.

Democrats intentionally redacted the name of the “victim” in the Epstein emails they released.

The unredacted version shows that it was Virginia Guiffre. Guiffre had testified multiple times that President Trump did nothing and that she never even saw him at Epstein’s house.

There is someone who needs to do some explaining, NY Times reporter Michael Wolff Just who spent time huge swaths of time with Jeffery Epstein.

Big news the media isn’t talking about:
Democrat Goverment Shutdown is OVER
Congressional Bill H.R. 5371 Signed into Law
NEW DATA: Lower Prices, Bigger Paychecks
Trump Administration Cracks Down on Foreign-Owned Meat Packing Cartels
Anti-Communism Week, 2025
President Donald J. Trump Secures Major Settlement with Cornell
Democrats Are to Blame for Airport Chaos

Mark Levin’s scathing take: The reporting is outrageous, and the headlines are grotesquely dishonest. The victim whose name is redacted is well known, Virginia Giuffre, who testified under oath and under penalty of perjury that Donald Trump never so much as flirted with her. We also read the sleazy efforts by certain reporters to push a false narrative and smear Trump. So, the question is: why did the Democrats release these emails, why did they release them now, why did they redact Giuffre’s name, and why are the media acting like there’s some bombshell?

The “release the files” crowd remind me of the “release the tax returns” crowd. There was no wrongdoing in the president’s tax returns, but they were leaked. And if there was wrongdoing by Trump in those so-called Epstein files, the question I keep asking is why wasn’t a single example of wrongdoing raised by the Biden regime or anyone else? Even now.
So, why not release the files? Exactly what “files” are they talking about? And what of Epstein’s victims? Do they get a say in whether files are released? It seems a lot more complicated to me. That said, the smearing of the president is totally unwarranted, even by his worst enemies, and certainly by his supposed friends and allies.

But media was implicated in the new emails. The New York Times:

Michael Wolff made ‘pile of cash’ writing Trump takedowns. Meanwhile he was advising Epstein https://t.co/ssAvWKb7ru

— Bryn (@Bryn32050638) November 13, 2025

More on Epstein adviser/strategist Michael Wolff. https://t.co/eE7gVBFqQK

— Byron York (@ByronYork) November 13, 2025

Epstein emails: The Dems and their lapdogs with laptops cry Wolff again

By: NY Post Editorial Board, Nov. 12, 2025:

A newly released email from disgraced late financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, referencing his former companion Ghislaine Maxwell and U.S. President Donald Trump, is seen in this handout image released by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee in Washington, D.C., U.S., on November 12, 2025 via REUTERS

What a low and cynical move by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee — releasing just enough of a Jeffrey Epstein email early Wednesday to inspire the most hysterical possible Trump-smearing coverage.

Even as they knew the full facts told a completely different story.

Of course all manner of “responsible” media played along: These lapdogs with laptops offered a host of headlines with some variation of “Trump spent hours alone with Epstein victim” — dirt that in this age of the internet will be the lasting impression many Americans take away, even though it’s centrally false.

Specifically, Dems circulated this carefully redacted email from the vile procurer:

“i want you to realize that that dog that hasn’t barked is trump..[VICTIM] spent hours at my house with him ,, he has never once been mentioned.”

Looks terrible — until you learn that [VICTIM] is the late Virginia Giuffre, who had worked for Trump before she fell into Epstein’s clutches, and had publicly said time and again that the future president never misbehaved in the least toward her.

Plus: Since Giuffre is dead, and so can’t possibly be hurt by any revelations, the only reason to block out her name was to conceal the fact that this gun had no smoke.

Fact is, the full record shows plainly that Epstein hated Trump, resentful that The Donald banned him from Mar-a-Lago long before even his first conviction.

Indeed, another email Dems released confirms that: In a 2016 exchange where salacious gossip-fabricating “journalist” Michael Wolff seems to have been advising Epstein on how to blackmail Trump, the sex criminal admits “trump said he asked me to resign,” then claims “he knew about the girls as he asked ghislaine to stop.”

(The Democrats expect people to trust Epstein’s word, since they’ll believe anyone as long he’s smearing Orange Man.)

After Dems’ bomb dropped, the White House rushed to get the full facts out, and the committee Republicans released 20,000 pages of Epstein documents to let the public see a far fuller story and so decide for itself — but too late to prevent the initial smear from making a vital first impression.

Indeed, it looks like the committee Dems released their carefully-curated smear precisely to minimize the impact of the full record, which includes (for example) emails that make ex-President Bill Clinton look bad.

Dems have done this “boy who cried wolf (ahem, Wolff)” routine so many times with “new Trump scandals” that no reasonable outlet should run claims like this without extensive checking to get the full, real story — but the media still went crazy Wednesday morning.

Continued…..