US Announces Travel Ban on European Censors, EU Leaders Panic – Threat to Their Censorship Industrial Complex

The censorship machine is panicking as its power is challenged. Free speech strikes back

The United States has announced a new travel ban targeting European officials involved in censorship and digital surveillance, marking a sharp escalation against what the Trump administration calls extraterritorial suppression of American speech.

The State Department is barring five “egregious” European figures in the “global censorship-industrial complex” from entering the US, it revealed Tuesday.

State Department officials contended that those five Europeans flouted a visa policy rolled out in May restricting those who work to censor protected speech in the US from entering the country.

“For far too long, ideologues in Europe have led organized efforts to coerce American platforms to punish American viewpoints they oppose,” Secretary of State Marco Rubio declared Tuesday. (NY Post)

According to Under Secretary of State Sarah B. Rogers, the measures are visa-based sanctions, not full Magnitsky-style financial penalties, but are intended to send an unmistakable message: foreign officials who devote their careers to censoring Americans are not welcome in the United States. While the targets are European, Rogers noted that some worked in coordination with U.S. bureaucrats involved in so-called Murthy-style speech suppression.

These sanctions are visa-related. We aren’t invoking severe Magnitsky-style financial measures, but our message is clear: if you spend your career fomenting censorship of American speech, you’re unwelcome on American soil. https://t.co/CYvR1HFnhR

— Under Secretary of State Sarah B. Rogers (@UnderSecPD) December 23, 2025

Among those sanctioned is Thierry Breton, a key architect of the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA). In August 2024, Breton publicly warned Elon Musk ahead of a livestream interview with President Trump, invoking the DSA and reminding X of ongoing enforcement proceedings related to “illegal content” and “disinformation.”

Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the action was long overdue, accusing European ideologues of running organized campaigns to pressure American platforms into silencing viewpoints they oppose. The administration made clear it will no longer tolerate foreign censorship regimes reaching into U.S. political discourse.

European Union leaders are reacting angrily to the U.S. travel bans targeting European officials accused of pressuring American tech companies to censor U.S. viewpoints, with the European Commission warning of unspecified “possible action” in response.

According to Sky News, the Commission said it would respond “swiftly and decisively” to what it called “unjustified measures,” framing the U.S. move as an attack on Europe’s “regulatory autonomy.” EU officials defended their digital rules—such as those governing online content moderation—claiming they are applied fairly and are designed to ensure a “safe” and “level playing field.”

Critics counter that this backlash exposes how threatened European regulators—and aligned factions of the American left—are by free expression. They argue that so-called digital safety and regulatory frameworks are being used to mask an industrial-scale censorship regime, one that relies on legal and bureaucratic mechanisms to suppress disfavored speech while insisting it is merely enforcing neutral rules.

Critics argue the backlash exposes how threatened European regulators—and aligned factions of the American left—are by free expression. They contend that digital “safety” frameworks function as industrial-scale censorship systems, cloaked in bureaucratic language while suppressing disfavored speech.

As Rubio put it: Europe’s censorship push has gone on long enough. The United States is drawing a line.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio: For far too long, ideologues in Europe have led organized efforts to coerce American platforms to punish American viewpoints they oppose. The Trump Administration will no longer tolerate these egregious acts of extraterritorial censorship (Rubio).