Climate (cult) Scientists Want A Worldwide Assessment Of Climate Doom Or Something

I mean, don’t they get these prognostications every couple of weeks?

‘The world remains unprepared’: Why scientists are calling for a global assessment of climate change

Wait, I don’t have global heating on here?

The world remains “unprepared” for the risks of climate change, despite overwhelming evidence that the planet is heading towards irreversible damage.

A group of experts has published a paper in the science journal Nature, warning that the world lacks an “authoritative and up to date assessment” of climate change risks that would help governments and citizens understand the urgency of cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

Despite the “huge consequences” of a warming world, there has never been an internationally coordinated and mandated global risk analysis. It means policy makers could be inadvertently undermining the full scale of the threat, ineffectively prioritising resources, and deploying the wrong kind of mitigation responses.

I mean, they seriously just keep trying to keep the doom going. They cannot let go. It’s in their DNA at this point, and they require that everyone be forced to join. To drink the kool aid.

Professor Rowan Sutton, one of two senior commentary authors and Director of the UK’s Met Office Hadley Centre, says humanity still has the opportunity to avoid the worst impacts of climate change and shape a “more prosperous, liveable future”.

“A global assessment of avoidable climate change risks would enable political leaders and citizens to fully understand what is at stake and motivate us all to seize that opportunity – while we still have it,” he adds.

Would this be the same Met Office that has continuously failed, as well as show itself to be captured by the doomsday cult? Anyhow, it would be about giving political leaders the ability to see where they can control citizens

A thorough global risk assessment would provide leaders with an “authoritative overview” of the most significant climate risks, their impacts, and the likelihood of disastrous outcomes.

Did they say authoritative or authoritarian?

Instead of being a “counsel of despair” it would provide the world with a clear picture of the outcomes that societies can still choose to avoid. It would support the development of timely measures for mitigation and highlight the extent of human agency.

We get some new or repeated point of doom outcomes daily. You know how many articles I skip daily because they are just the same old same old? Tell you what: if you Believe than make your own life carbon neutral. Live it.