New York Times Publishes VILE Blood Libel Against Israel On The Eve of Publication of October 7 Unimaginable Horrors Report

A detailed report came out for the first time about the unimaginable sexual violence on October 7th and following it. The NY Times actually reached out to the rapists and pedophiles to publish their response.

And that is what the world is talking about, not the unspeakable savagery revealed in the October 7th report.

This is the “gold standard” of journalism. Is it any wonder hatred of Jews and the Jewish state is on the rise. This is what the Jewish people are up against.

The timing of the antisemitic NY Times “dog rape” article is clear. It’s  because actual horror was about to be shown.

You really may want to ask why the NY Times has to go completely anti-Israel when they can just report, the—what do you call it—- news.

Question: What the hell kind of journalism is it to ask terrorists for a quote?

The answer: The journalism that reports about rape dogs used by Israel to rape Palestinians. That kind.

The NY Times literally has no red lines when it comes to vilifying the Jews.

In response to the column, Israel’s ministry of foreign affairs took to social media to strongly condemn the article, claiming the NY Times ‘chose to publish one of the worst blood libels ever to appear in the modern press.’

The post continued: ‘In an unfathomable inversion of reality, and through an endless stream of baseless lies, propagandist Nicholas Kristof turns the victim into the accused.

October 7 Barbarism Beyond All Imagination: New Report Reveals Previously Undisclosed Details How Muslim Terrorists Performed Unspeakable Horrors

This New York Times “article” about Israel is such a journalistic atrocity that I actually feel stupid reading it out loud.

If everyone at the NYT who is responsible for this is not fired, then the publication will lose whatever shred of credibility it has left. pic.twitter.com/nhXSl5AW1D

— Scott Jennings (@ScottJenningsKY) May 12, 2026

The NY Times would publish testimony from people who blow themselves up for a “living” just so a Jew might get killed alongside them, claiming Israeli dogs raped them, and it goes viral, while testimonies from Israelis about what happened to them barely make it anywhere. https://t.co/NTBPh462rM

— AP (@Average_NY_Guy) May 12, 2026

I swear, just when you think the NY Times can’t stoop any lower, they go and surprise us all.

A detailed report came out yesterday for the first time about the sexual violence on October 7th and following it.

The NY Times literally reached out to the rapists and pedophiles to… pic.twitter.com/bHisMxGV2E

— Hillel Fuld (@HilzFuld) May 13, 2026

Israel accuses NY Times of ‘blood libel’ as paper alleges widespread rape of Palestinian prisoners

— Daily Mail (@DailyMail) May 13, 2026

The piece from Nicholas Kristof accused Israel of using dogs to rape Palestinian prisoners (It’s insidious and there’s an insouciance about it. There’s a kind of shrug your shoulders—who cares?—attitude about it, no matter what lies we spread…. And what happened yesterday, what Nick Kristof is guilty of is the blood libel. The same way we didn’t put blood in our wafers for Passover and we didn’t poison wells in the Middle Ages. We don’t starve people and we don’t train dogs to rape people. The New York Times is now coupled with Tucker Carlson and a whole group of conspiratorial podcasters who blame everything on Israel and the Jewish people. You got an itch on your behind that’s the Jewish people behind it. Anything you can think of. There’s a disease out there, the Jews are responsible. A lack of peace in the Middle East, the Jews are responsible. The budget deficit in the United States, the Jews are responsible. This has a history and Scott, it doesn’t end well (Jennings).

Rep. Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J., joined the growing choir of critics lambasting The New York Times for its explosive report alleging systemic sexual violence targeting Palestinian prisoners, including training dogs to rape them.

A report authored by Times columnist Nicholas Kristof went viral Monday outlining claims from 14 men and women who say they were “sexually assaulted by Israeli settlers or members of the security forces.” The allegations range from abuse of genitalia to penetration by a dog.

“WTF @nytimes!” Gottheimer wrote on X. “Nick Kristof amplifies proven Hamas-affiliated sources and their propaganda, while the NYT continues to gloss over the systematic sexual violence, rape, and mutilation Hamas committed on October 7, now fully documented in the new Civil Commission report.

The NY Times just published a piece claiming that Israeli soldiers used dogs to rape Palestinians.

This is not a joke. I repeat. This is not a joke.

I wouldn’t use this trash as toilet paper.

The NYT has zero credibility left. Zero! pic.twitter.com/SbZVbPHbnr

— Hillel Fuld (@HilzFuld) May 11, 2026

Remember: The New York Times devoted a long, admiring profile to this rape denier, portraying her as “fearless.”

Albanese: “Look, there are different views on what happened on October 7th… There were fabrications, like the mass rape and other horror stories.” pic.twitter.com/tsAfmwr8fM

— Hillel Neuer (@HillelNeuer) May 12, 2026

Jerusalem Post:

A landmark report by the Civil Commission on October 7 Crimes by Hamas Against Women and Children, made waves this week, drawing widespread attention to the systematic atrocities committed during the Hamas attack.

Spanning over 300 pages, the report meticulously documents the use of sexual violence as a deliberate tool of war, as well as the torture of family members to inflict deeper psychological trauma on victims. It was, by any measure, a sobering and necessary reckoning with the events of that day.

Yet the conversation surrounding the report was quickly overshadowed. A New York Times opinion piece entered the discourse with its own set of claims, this time focused on alleged abuses on the other side of the conflict, including accusations of Israeli forces using trained dogs to sexually assault Palestinian prisoners.

The timing proved explosive, and what could have been a focused moment of accountability for Hamas’s documented crimes devolved into the familiar cycle of Israel-Palestine finger-pointing that has long plagued coverage of the conflict.

The episode raises an uncomfortable question: Is journalism serving the public, or undermining it?https://twitter.com/MarinaMedvin/status/2054383672409669834?s=20

Source: https://gellerreport.com/2026/05/new-york-times-publishes-vile-blood-libel-against-israel-on-the-eve-of-publication-of-october-7-unimaginable-horrors-report.html/