United Nations – Should USA pull out, real and honest discussion (logic, not feelings)…

I may NOT always LIKE Reality – BUT I HAVE TO DEAL IN/WITH REALITY, like it or not!!!

I do NOT always get my way so I am going to TAKE MY BALL AND GO HOME is NOT a valid ADULT response!!!

If I want to LIVE like it is the year 225 then I better figure out how to build a inter-timenal device to transport me back to 225
cuz this is the World now in 2025 and I/we have to deal in REALITIES of 2025 not 225!!!
Let me bottom-line this for all – you can rant/rave ALL YOU LIKE about “pulling from UN” but your position (no matter how you protest otherwise about it being “principled” WEAKENS AMERICA AND EMPOWERS OUR ENEMIES. PERIOD! You want pull from UN – you are FOR weakening the USA and emboldening our Enemies. PERIOD!! Short version, done, end of story/discussion, now if you like you can continue but ZERO changes that bottom-line. NOTHING. ZIP. ZERO. NADDA. Or, run away, hide, PRETEND, this is NOT THE CASE, but please by all means listen/watch the video or read further the piece OR NOT and maintain your DELUSIONAL (your LIBERALtarian superior) position otherwise (cannot be swayed cuz YOU WANT OUR ENEMIES STRONGER).

[below from GALAXY AI Video Summarizer]

The Debate on U.S. Withdrawal from the United Nations: A Call for Logic Over Emotion

September 27, 2025 4 min read Politics

This blog post explores the ongoing debate about whether the U.S. should withdraw from the United Nations. It argues against withdrawal, emphasizing the importance of U.S. presence in global governance to counteract the influence of adversarial nations like Russia and China. The author advocates for a more engaged and assertive U.S. role in the UN rather than isolationism, highlighting the interconnectedness of global issues and the necessity of maintaining a strong diplomatic presence.

 

The question of whether the United States should withdraw from the United Nations has been a topic of heated discussion for years. Recently, this debate has gained traction, particularly with mentions of defunding the UN by political figures. In this post, we will explore the arguments surrounding this issue, emphasizing the need for a logical approach rather than an emotional reaction.

 

The Polling Perspective

 

A recent poll conducted on social media revealed that a staggering 98% of respondents favored defunding the United Nations. This overwhelming sentiment reflects a growing frustration among many Americans regarding the costs associated with hosting the UN in New York City. The argument posits that since the U.S. bears the financial burden of the UN’s operations, it should not continue to fund an organization perceived as ineffective or biased against American interests.

 

The Argument for Withdrawal

 

Proponents of withdrawal often express a desire to take a stand against what they see as an organization that does not align with U.S. values or interests. They argue that pulling out would send a message of discontent with the UN’s operations and its perceived failures. However, this perspective raises critical questions about the implications of such a move.

 

The Consequences of Surrender

 

One of the most significant concerns regarding a U.S. withdrawal from the UN is the potential power vacuum it would create. Without U.S. involvement, adversarial nations like Russia and China could dominate the UN agenda, pushing through resolutions that may not align with democratic values or international stability. The U.S. has historically used its veto power to block resolutions that could harm its interests or those of its allies. If the U.S. were to withdraw, these nations could easily advance their agendas without opposition.

 

The Importance of U.S. Presence

 

The argument against withdrawal emphasizes the necessity of U.S. presence in the UN as a stabilizing force. The U.S. plays a crucial role in maintaining a balance of power within the organization. By remaining engaged, the U.S. can exert influence and advocate for policies that promote democracy, human rights, and global security. The notion of simply withdrawing and allowing adversaries to dictate the terms of international relations is seen as a form of surrender.

 

Emotional Reactions vs. Logical Thinking

 

The emotional reaction to the idea of withdrawing from the UN often stems from frustration with the organization’s inefficiencies. However, it is essential to approach this issue with logic and reason. The reality is that global interdependence means that actions taken in one part of the world can have far-reaching consequences elsewhere. Ignoring this interconnectedness is not a viable solution.

 

The Reality of Global Interdependence

 

In today’s world, isolationism is not a practical approach. The U.S. cannot afford to ignore global issues, as they can directly impact national security and economic stability. The presence of nuclear weapons and the potential for international conflict necessitate a strong diplomatic presence.

 

The idea that the U.S. can simply withdraw and remain unaffected by global events is a dangerous misconception.

 

Alternative Solutions

 

Instead of withdrawing from the UN, a more constructive approach would be to advocate for reforms within the organization. This could involve pushing for greater accountability and transparency, as well as ensuring that the UN operates in a manner that aligns with U.S. interests and values. Additionally, relocating the UN headquarters to a more neutral location could be a topic for discussion, as it may change the dynamics of international diplomacy.

 

Conclusion

 

The debate over whether the U.S. should withdraw from the United Nations is complex and multifaceted. While frustrations with the UN are valid, the solution is not to abandon the organization altogether. Instead, the U.S. should strive to maintain its presence and influence within the UN, advocating for reforms and ensuring that it remains a key player in global governance. Surrendering to emotional reactions and opting for isolationism could have dire consequences for both the U.S., our Allies, and the broader international community [which effects us at times, LIKE OR NOT - is Reality of our times].

 

It is crucial to engage in this discussion with logic, reason, and a clear understanding of the realities of our interconnected world.

 

 

VOTE in the ONLINE “Defund the UN?” Poll: 
https://truthsocial.com/group/donald-trump/posts/115268584558690796

 

 

 

JLenardDetroit – Stories Contributed

 

United Nations – Should USA pull out, real and honest discussion (logic, not feelings)…

Politics | Sep 27 2025 02:00

 

Left FUDGING MORE DATA to create more Left FALSE NARRATIVES….

Conspiracy Theories | Sep 26 2025 18:32

 

Solving the Gaza/Palestine situation FINALLY – get NATO involved (not how you may think at first)…

War and Conflict | Sep 26 2025 14:17

 

OK, let’s play that GAME again…. Offer Palestinian State AGAIN and let them REJECT it again… Cannot be just RECOGNITION without conditions…

Middle East | Sep 26 2025 11:49

 

Origins of (and the games some play with) Language…

Strange | Sep 25 2025 17:04

 

I cover THE #NEWS, so OK let’s cover the TV NEWS… Since Jimmy made himself the story, not us…

TV | Sep 24 2025 15:41

 

War… or trying to avoid WWIII?

War and Conflict | Sep 24 2025 11:47

 

Numerology and Charlie Kirk Assassination

Conspiracy Theories | Sep 24 2025 11:04

 

The TDS and RFKJrDS responses to latest MAHA talk….

Health | Sep 23 2025 19:10

 

CTP3… American Community foundations and its being undermined…

Christian News | Sep 20 2025 20:07

 

Life, Living, Legacy?… low cost eBook….

Books | Sep 20 2025 12:10

 

Russian Drones into Poland…

Military | Sep 17 2025 18:51

 

RELATED
CTP What Color Is The Sky REALLY? NonPolitical Question Inroads Into Politics BTS/SP Video