Welcome to the NEW WORLD ORDER! Trump Blasts Davos & Things Get Interesting!

Trump’s Davos Shockwave: Greenland, Canada, Panama & the Forgotten Plan to Reshape North America

By Leak Project

What President Donald Trump said at the World Economic Forum in Davos this week was not just controversial — it was historically loaded.

While mainstream headlines focused on Trump’s sharp tone toward allies, a deeper and largely ignored dimension has emerged: Trump did not invent the idea of uniting Greenland, Canada, the United States, and key strategic regions like Panama. That concept has existed for nearly a century — and Davos may have just brought it back into the open.

Davos: More Than a Speech

At Davos, Trump doubled down on his position that Greenland is strategically vital to U.S. national security, citing Arctic dominance, rare-earth minerals, missile defense, and growing pressure from Russia and China in polar regions. He reiterated that the United States wants “ownership” or formal control — while publicly stating he would not use military force.

But Trump went further.

He delivered blunt remarks about Canada’s dependence on U.S. economic and military protection, stating that Canada “lives because of the United States,” a comment that sent shockwaves through Ottawa and European diplomatic circles. NATO allies were criticized for underfunding defense, relying on American protection, and pursuing energy and immigration policies Trump labeled unsustainable.

Shortly after, reports confirmed Air Force One briefly turned back en route to Davos due to a technical issue, fueling speculation online about the symbolic timing of disruption during a speech already destabilizing global narratives.

Trump’s Truth Social Message: The Unfiltered Signal

On Truth Social, Trump made clear this was not idle rhetoric. His post reinforced the idea that Greenland, Canada, and hemispheric security are interconnected, emphasizing borders, trade routes, energy corridors, and defense infrastructure.

This messaging aligns closely with a far older framework — one most Americans have never heard of.

The Part the Media Ignored: Trump Didn’t Invent This

According to AGC News, Trump’s language closely mirrors proposals from the Technocratic Movement of the 1930s, which advocated restructuring North America into a single continental system governed by efficiency, energy distribution, and centralized planning.

This historical model proposed:

• A North American Technate

• Integration of Canada, Greenland, the U.S., and parts of Central America

• Control of key trade chokepoints like the Panama Canal

• Governance driven by technical expertise rather than traditional nation-states

Whether Trump is consciously invoking this history or independently arriving at similar conclusions is debatable — but the overlap is undeniable.

In other words: this idea predates Trump by nearly 100 years.

Why Greenland, Canada, and Panama Matter Now

This is not about imperialism in the traditional sense — it’s about logistics, energy, and survival in a multipolar world.

• Greenland controls Arctic access, missile defense positioning, and rare-earth minerals.

• Canada holds vast freshwater, energy reserves, and geographic depth.

• Panama controls one of the most critical shipping corridors on Earth.

As global supply chains fracture and military posturing intensifies, control over these regions becomes existential rather than optional.

Domestic Chaos Mirrors Global Fracture

While Trump’s Davos speech reshaped foreign policy narratives, the United States itself is under strain.

In Minnesota, protests erupted after an ICE agent fatally shot Renee Good, triggering nationwide outrage. The Department of Justice declined to open a criminal investigation, even as grand jury subpoenas were issued to top state officials, deepening the divide between federal authority and local governance.

At the same time, revelations emerged that a far-left activist involved in a controversial church storming incident raised over $1 million through a nonprofit, raising questions about political funding, civil unrest, and selective enforcement.

A Nation Under Pressure — Literally

Adding to the instability:

• A major winter storm is forecast to impact tens of millions across the U.S., threatening power grids and transportation.

• Iran’s top diplomat issued a direct warning to the United States, signaling escalating geopolitical risk.

• Seismic activity and earthquake alerts continue to raise concerns about infrastructure resilience.

The Bigger Picture

Taken together, these events suggest something far larger than isolated news stories.

We are watching:

• Borders questioned

• Alliances strained

• Historical blueprints resurfacing

• Domestic cohesion weakening

• Natural and geopolitical pressures converging

Trump’s Davos speech was not just a speech — it was a signal.

Whether one supports or opposes him, the implications are impossible to ignore. The conversation is no longer about if global systems will change — but how fast, and who will control the transition.

The question now is simple:

Was Davos the beginning of a new geopolitical reality — or the moment the public finally noticed one already unfolding?