Why Adding More Software Won’t Fix Your Firm 

Why Adding More Software Won’t Fix Your Firm 

Most law firm owners are solving the wrong problem. 

They think they need better technology. 

What they actually need are functioning systems. 

After leading Lawyerist Lab and working with hundreds of small law firm owners, I see this pattern constantly: Firms buy software to solve problems that software can’t fix. 

A new practice management system. A client portal. An intake tool. Document automation. 

And six months later? Same chaos. Just with more monthly subscriptions. 

Here’s what’s actually happening: You’re trying to automate workflows that don’t exist yet. 

You can’t tech your way out of a systems problem. You can only automate the chaos faster. 

Who This Is For (And Who It Isn’t) 

This is for firm owners who: 

• Are tired of being the bottleneck in every workflow 

• Want their team to execute consistently without constant oversight 

• Are ready to do the unglamorous work of building infrastructure 

• Understand that systems require discipline, not just documentation 

This is not for firm owners who: 

• Think there’s a software solution to every problem 

• Want quick fixes without doing the process work 

• Expect their team to figure out systems on their own 

• Aren’t willing to enforce what they build 

If you’re looking for a tech recommendation, this isn’t it. 

If you’re ready to build the infrastructure that makes technology actually useful, keep reading. 

Subscribe

Join the Lawyerist Community

Get expert insights and practical tips delivered to your inbox every week.

Subscribe Now

Why Law Firms Keep Buying Software That Doesn’t Fix Anything 

Here’s the cycle: 

Something breaks. Client onboarding is inconsistent. Communication falls through cracks. Documents go missing. 

So you think: “There must be a tool for this.” 

You research. You demo. You buy. 

You implement it… sort of. Your team adopts it… inconsistently. 

Six months later, you’re back to the same problem. Just with another tool you’re not fully using. 

This isn’t a technology failure. It’s a systems failure. 

The tool can’t create a process that doesn’t exist. It can only support one. 

And most firms are trying to make software do the thinking they haven’t done yet. 

What Systems Actually Are (And Why Documentation Isn’t Enough) 

Most firms think they have systems because they have: 

• SOPs in a Google Doc 

• Templates somewhere 

• A process “we usually follow” 

That’s not a system. 

A system produces consistent outcomes regardless of who’s executing it. 

If your intake only works when you handle it personally—that’s not a system. That’s you. 

If client communication is great with one team member but falls apart with another—that’s not a system. That’s dependency. 

If your team asks “how do I do this?” for situations that happen weekly—you don’t have a system. You have chaos with documentation. 

Real systems mean: 

• Anyone trained can execute it and get the same result 

• The outcome is consistent every time 

• It runs without your constant intervention 

Most firms have process fragments. They don’t have systems. 

Process Before Tools: Why the Order Matters 

Firms start backwards. 

“We need better client communication, so let’s get a client portal.” 

But they’ve never defined: 

• What clients actually need to know, and when 
• What happens when someone drops the ball 
• Who’s responsible for communication at each stage 
• What “good” communication looks like 

So they buy the portal. It sits empty. Or gets used inconsistently. Or becomes another place where things fall through the cracks. 

The problem wasn’t missing technology. The problem was missing process. 

Here’s the order that actually works: 

1. Define What You’re Trying to Accomplish 

Not “better communication.” That’s too vague. 

Specific outcomes: 

• Every client knows their case status within 48 hours of any milestone 
• No client has to ask for updates 
• Every transition point is documented and communicated 

If you can’t articulate the exact outcome, you can’t build a system. 

2. Map the Process That Gets You There 

Who does what, when, and what triggers the next action. 

Not “someone handles this” or “we usually do X.” 

Documented steps: 

• Milestone happens ? Assigned person documents outcome ? Client notification sends within 24 hours ? Update logged in system 

No ambiguity. No “figure it out.” 

3. Test It Without Technology 

Run the process manually first. 

Spreadsheets. Paper checklists. Whatever’s simplest. 

Find where it breaks. Fix the gaps. Refine it. 

Most firms skip this step. They want the software to solve problems they haven’t diagnosed yet. 

It won’t. 

4. Only Then Choose the Tool 

Now you know what you actually need. 

Not what the sales demo promised. Not what sounds impressive. 

What YOUR system requires. 

And here’s what changes: You need way less than you think. 

Because you’re not shopping for software to “handle communication.” 

You’re looking for a tool that supports the specific, documented process you already built. 

Why Building the System Is Only Step One 

Here’s what most firms don’t understand: 

Building a system is about 30% of the work. 

The other 70% is: 

• Training your team to use it 

• Enforcing that they actually use it 

• Catching when they don’t 

• Iterating when it breaks 

• Holding people accountable when they skip steps 

You can document the perfect system. If your team doesn’t follow it, it doesn’t exist. 

Deployment Means Training 

Not “here’s the new process, figure it out.” 

Real training: 

• Walk through it step-by-step 
• Show them where things live 
• Let them practice while you watch 
• Explain why it matters (not just what to do) 
• Answer questions until it’s clear 

Most firms document and assume that’s enough. 

It’s not. 

Enforcement Means Accountability 

Someone has to check that the system is being followed. 

Not hope. Not assume. 

Check. 

Weekly: 

• Did every new client go through onboarding? 
• Were all steps completed? 
• Did any fall through the cracks? 

When something breaks, you address it immediately. Not later. Not “next time.” 

Iteration Means Improvement 

No system is perfect on day one. 

You deploy it. You find gaps. You fix them. 

A step takes longer than expected? Adjust. 

Team members are skipping a part? Find out why and fix the actual problem. 

Clients are confused about something? Clarify it. 

Systems are living infrastructure. Not “set it and forget it.” 

Firms that build good systems revisit them quarterly. They ask: 

• What’s working? 
• What’s breaking? 
• What’s changed that requires an update? 

The firms that struggle? They build once and never touch it again. 

Then wonder why it stopped working. 

Subscribe

Join the Lawyerist Community

Get expert insights and practical tips delivered to your inbox every week.

Subscribe Now

The Real Systems Gap in Law Firms 

You don’t have a technology problem. 

You have an infrastructure problem. 

Your workflows aren’t designed. Your processes aren’t documented. Your team isn’t trained. Your systems aren’t enforced. 

And you’re trying to solve all of that by buying software. 

It doesn’t work. 

Software doesn’t create consistency. Process does. 

Software doesn’t eliminate confusion. Clarity does. 

Software doesn’t build capacity. Systems do. 

The firms that scale aren’t the ones with the best tech stack. 

They’re the ones with disciplined systems that actually get followed. 

How to Diagnose Where Your Systems Are Broken 

Ask this about every core workflow: 

“Can someone else on my team execute this and get the same outcome I would?” 

If the answer is no, you don’t have a system. You have yourself. 

Run this for: 

• Client intake and onboarding 
• Case delivery and matter management 
• Communication throughout engagement 
• Billing and collections 
• Document production 

For each, ask: 

• Is it documented clearly enough that anyone trained could do it? 
• Do we actually train people, or assume they’ll figure it out? 
• Do we revisit and improve it, or ignore it once it’s “done”? 
• Do we enforce it, or let people do their own thing? 

The gaps are costing you capacity, consistency, and probably clients. 

Frequently Asked Questions About Building Law Firm Systems 

Why can’t I just buy software that has the system built in? 

Because every firm’s process is different. Software can enforce a system once you design it, but it can’t design your system for you. If you don’t know what you need, the software just automates chaos. 

How long does it take to build a functioning system? 

For one workflow (like client onboarding), expect 2-4 weeks to design, document, and test the process. Then another 4-6 weeks to train your team, deploy it, and work out the kinks. Most firms underestimate the deployment and enforcement phase. 

What if my team resists following the system? 

Resistance means one of three things: the system doesn’t actually work and needs refinement, your team wasn’t properly trained on why it matters, or there’s no accountability for following it. All three are fixable, but they require you to lead differently. 

Do I really need to document everything? 

No. Start with high-impact workflows—things that happen frequently and directly affect clients or revenue. Client onboarding, matter delivery, communication protocols, billing. Don’t try to systematize everything at once. 

Can I just hire someone to build systems for me? 

You can hire help with design and documentation. But you can’t outsource enforcement or iteration. Systems require leadership—someone has to hold the team accountable for following them and improving them over time. 

Where to Start If Your Firm Feels Like Chaos 

Don’t start by shopping for software. 

Start by building one system. Just one. 

Pick the workflow causing the most pain: 

• Is intake inconsistent? 
• Does onboarding feel chaotic? 
• Are handoffs between team members a disaster? 
• Do clients constantly ask where things stand? 

Choose one. 

Define the process. Document it. Train your team. Deploy it. Enforce it. Iterate when it breaks. 

Then—and only then—look for technology to support it. 

Most firms need less software and better systems. 

Not more tools. More discipline. 

Subscribe

Join the Lawyerist Community

Get expert insights and practical tips delivered to your inbox every week.

Subscribe Now