Germ Theory Vs. Terrain Theory: Why You’ve Likely Only Heard Of The First Theory

Most of us have heard of germ theory ad nauseam since the beginning of the COVID-19 scamdemic. This theory suggests that invisible germs are responsible for every illness, cold, and flu. But there is another theory that isn’t getting much attention, and that’s terrain theory.

We all likely remember COVID-19 being called “the invisible enemy.” The mainstream media repeated it nonstop for close to a year. We were told to lock ourselves up, sterilize our living spaces, and cover our faces to slow down the spread of the “dangerous” novel virus.

“Terrain theory” argues that if the body is well and balanced, then germs that are a natural part of life and the environment will be dealt with by the body without causing sickness.

French chemist Antoine Béchamp had a different theory than microbiologist Louis Pasteur. Béchamp’s theory, known as terrain theory, stated that microbes were necessary for proper bodily functions, and if the host was healthy, there wouldn’t be a sickness manifesting. Pasteur invented pasteurization and vaccines for rabies and anthrax and claimed that many diseases are caused by invisible germs.

Now we know why germ theory was the one the “scientists” and ruling class went with. All we have to do is follow the money; there’s no money to be made by healthy humans, and we are still experiencing this onslaught of propaganda today.

In the United States, ultra-processed foods make up nearly 60% of what the typical adult eats, and nearly 70% of what kids eat, according to statistics shared by NPR.  Americans are also progressively increasing their carbohydrate intake as they lower their fat and protein to government standards. Not following a “proper human diet” could be part of the problem, and why germ theory has been able to take over the narrative.

However, we feel it’s important to at least know that there are competing theories out there and that they were pushed aside for those that can make institutions a lot of money.

All claims about viruses as pathogens are wrong and are based on easily recognizable, understandable, and verifiable misinterpretations. The real causes of diseases and phenomena which are ascribed to viruses have already been discovered and researched; this knowledge is now available. All scientists who think they are working with viruses in laboratories are actually working with typical particles of specific dying tissues or cells that were prepared in a special way. They believe that those tissues and cells are dying because they were infected by a virus. In reality, those prepared tissues and cells are dying because they were starved and poisoned as a consequence of the experiments in the lab. –The Virus Misconception Part 1, Dr. Stefan Lanka

Dr. Lanka claims that all viruses are actually simply cellular particles of dying cells. These can be referred to as exosomes, although Dr. Lanka refrains from doing so, last least at this stage of his writing. Exosomes range in size from 30 to 150 nanometers and are membrane-bound extracellular vesicles (EVs) that are produced in the endosomal compartment of most eukaryotic (cells with a membrane) cells.

The death of tissues/cells is also regarded as the isolation of a virus because they claim that something from the outside, from another organism, was presumably brought into the laboratory. The fact is and remains that a virus has never been isolated according to the meaning of the word isolation, and it has never been photographed and biochemically characterized as a whole unique structure. The electron micrographs of the alleged viruses, for example, really only show cellular particles from dying tissue and cells, and most photos show only a computer model (CGI – computer-generated images). Because the involved parties BELIEVE that the dying tissue and cells transform themselves into viruses, their death is also regarded as propagation of the virus. The involved parties still believe this because the discoverer of this method was awarded the Nobel Prize and his papers remain the reference papers on “viruses”.  –The Virus Misconception Part 1, Dr. Stefan Lanka

Béchamp’s theory has no profit in it, at least not for the medical establishment. A diet close to what our bodies were designed to eat (whole foods, heavy on red meat) has also been touted as disease-causing. We are in a tough spot and may need to decide if we are going to continue to listen to the mainstream scientists, whose funding comes from those seeking to profit from our illness or start looking deeper on our own.

This article has been contributed by SHTF Plan. Visit www.SHTFplan.com for alternative news, commentary and preparedness info.