They Said It Was COVID… But The Death Curve Follows Hospitals and Deadly Drugs

How Midazolam, Morphine, and Reckless Doctors May Have Rewritten the Story of Pandemic Deaths

Right in the middle of the COVID storm—when every headline screamed about case counts, curves, and variants—something quieter was unfolding in the background. It didn’t trend. It didn’t dominate cable news. But families felt it. A shocking number of deaths were happening in ways that didn’t match the public narrative, and almost nobody wanted to talk about it.

People were told their loved ones had been taken by the virus. Yet, as the dust has settled, a second story has started to flicker into view—a story about powerful sedatives like midazolam and strong painkillers like morphine, given under official hospital and government protocols, sometimes to people who may not have been dying of COVID at all.

And now, as researchers revisit the data with fresh eyes, a hard question is being asked out loud:

How many of those early “COVID deaths” were actually drug-driven deaths?

One of the most detailed analyses—done by researcher Wilson Sy and focused on data from the United Kingdom—draws a disturbing picture. When you track midazolam shipments across the country and compare them with spikes in excess deaths in the months that followed, the two lines almost sit on top of each other.

That alone should make anyone stop and breathe.

When A Drug Shipment Predicts A Death Spike

Imagine a simple graph pinned to a wall. One line shows how many doses of midazolam were shipped across the UK each month. The other line shows the number of people who died above the normal five-year average.

Now slide the drug line forward by one month.

Suddenly, the two curves nearly merge—tracking one another with a 91 percent correlation during the first wave.

That’s not a gentle nudge. That’s a flashing red indicator you can see from across the room.

In April 2020, when the UK’s first wave of “COVID deaths” hit its terrifying peak, excess deaths jumped nearly 98 percent above normal. Meanwhile, midazolam had surged just weeks earlier. When the timing is aligned with that one-month delay, the connection becomes almost impossible to ignore.

Statisticians live for clear, reproducible patterns like this. They also lose sleep over them.

A Pattern That Shows Up Everywhere

What’s even more striking is that this wasn’t a one-region fluke. When the data was broken into regions—London, the Northwest, the Southwest—the same pattern appeared again and again.

Whenever midazolam use increased, excess deaths jumped the next month. Whenever midazolam dropped off, excess deaths cooled down too.

That kind of reproducibility across geography is exactly what scientists look for when deciding whether something is coincidence or causation tapping on the door.

Now, it’s important to say this out loud: Many nurses and doctors weren’t out to harm anyone. They were drowning in chaos, taking orders from above, and trying to give comfort in a moment when fear overshadowed everything.

But midazolam depresses breathing. Morphine depresses breathing. Frail elderly patients already struggling for air do not have much wiggle room. And when you combine these drugs under broad, hastily written “end-of-life” protocols…well, you don’t need a medical degree to understand how sedation could slide quietly into something that looked an awful lot like euthanasia.

A Pandemic of Iatrogenic Harm?

The deeper you dig, the more Sy’s analysis raises a possibility few officials want to consider: that a significant share of early pandemic deaths may have been caused not by the virus, but by the hospital response.

He calls it an “iatrogenic pandemic”—a wave of deaths caused by medical interventions themselves.

Here’s where things get even more troubling. According to government surveillance and antibody testing, the actual spread of SARS-CoV-2 during the UK’s April 2020 peak appears far lower than the official death count suggested. Later waves were far larger in terms of confirmed infections—yet the fatality rate was far lower.

So if the virus wasn’t raging uncontrollably during that first spike…what was?

The midazolam curve answers with uncomfortable clarity.

Even as vaccines rolled out in early 2021, another spike of 16,000+ excess deaths appeared in January alone—yet the timing didn’t line up neatly with vaccination rates. It lined up with midazolam again.

Infection Fatality Rates That Simply Don’t Add Up

When you take April 2020 death numbers at face value and assume they were all caused by COVID infection, you end up with an infection fatality rate of around 24 percent—almost one in four infected people dying.

That’s not just unrealistic; it’s biologically absurd.

Later data, once the panic subsided, put the infection fatality rate closer to 0.18 percent, mostly in people in their 80s and 90s with multiple underlying conditions.

Yes, early testing was chaotic and limited. Yes, math was messy. But even after accounting for those issues, you can’t turn a virus that’s 0.18 percent fatal into one that kills 24 percent of everyone it touches.

Something else was amplifying those numbers. Something that depresses breathing. Something that tracks tightly with death. Something like…midazolam and morphine.

Coroners, Data, and a System That Fell Asleep

You would think that if thousands of unexplained deaths suddenly lined up with a pattern of sedative use, coroners—the oldest watchdog system in English law—would raise the alarm.

But there was almost no pushback.

No national investigation.
No coordinated concern.
No flood of inquests.

Just…quiet.

Part of the problem is the UK’s creaking, outdated data system. Sy points to warnings made more than a century ago by Alfred Russel Wallace—who later studied smallpox vaccination statistics. Wallace found that government data was riddled with gaps, contradictions, and biases that made meaningful analysis nearly impossible.

His basic message was blunt: bad data plus powerful institutions equals danger.

Sy’s conclusion is that not much has changed in 150 years.

Wallace, Smallpox, and Lessons We Didn’t Learn

Wallace’s work on smallpox wasn’t just about vaccines. It was about honesty. He warned that sloppy data can lead entire nations down the wrong path—and that once a narrative forms, governments rarely revisit it, even when evidence piles up.

Sy uses the same “big picture” lens, looking not at anecdotes but at nationwide patterns. And when you do that for the UK’s COVID experience, the picture comes into focus: the official story leaned almost entirely on the virus while quietly ignoring a drug curve that matches the death curve step for step.

History doesn’t repeat, but sometimes it hums the same tune.

Families Deserve Answers—Before the Records Vanish

For families who lost loved ones in 2020 and 2021, none of this is abstract. It’s personal. It still hurts.

If someone’s mother or grandfather died in a care home under “end-of-life care,” given midazolam or morphine, and the death certificate simply said “COVID,” how can a family ever know what really happened?

And here’s the ticking time bomb: UK medical records are typically kept for only seven years.

There is a shrinking window to anonymize and release prescribing data so independent analysts can determine how many deaths were viral—and how many were iatrogenic.

If officials run out the clock, the truth will die with the records.

The Clock Is Ticking on the Truth

So where does all of this leave us?

On the surface, Sy’s paper is a cold statistical analysis full of graphs and correlation coefficients. But just beneath the numbers is something much louder: an alarm bell for anyone willing to hear it.

It suggests that fear, rushed policy, powerful sedatives, and weak oversight may have created a hidden second pandemic—one driven not by a pathogen, but by protocols.

Yet there’s still time to face the truth honestly.

Health agencies could release anonymized midazolam, morphine, and outcome data.
Coroners could revisit their silence. Regulators could rethink end-of-life protocols involving respiratory depressants.

And the public could insist—loudly—on clean, transparent data.

Because until governments are willing to confront their own mistakes, families will keep wondering what really happened behind closed doors. And that quiet suspicion—that many of those early pandemic deaths were avoidable—will hang in the air like smoke from a fire no one wants to admit ever burned.

Source: https://www.offthegridnews.com/what-they-dont-want-you-to-know/they-said-it-was-covid-but-the-death-curve-follows-hospitals-and-deadly-drugs/