Why Government Intervention Is Fueling The Housing Disaster

Via SchiffGold.com,

The United States is grappling with a severe housing affordability crisis that has persisted for years, leaving millions of Americans struggling to keep a roof over their heads. While some argue for increased government intervention, free market principles offer the most effective solution the issue.

According to the National Alliance to End Homelessness, a record-high 653,104 people were experiencing homelessness on a single night in January 2023.

This crisis has been exacerbated by a severe shortage of affordable housing, with the National Low-Income Housing Coalition reporting a deficit of 7.3 million affordable rental homes for low-income renters.

At first glance, these statistics might seem to call for more government intervention.

However, a deeper analysis reveals that many of our current housing woes stem from misguided government policies that have distorted the market and created artificial scarcity.

Zoning laws and building regulations, often championed as protections for communities, have in reality severely restricted the supply of housing.

Restrictive zoning laws have become a silent catalyst for the homelessness crisis, creating artificial housing shortages that drive prices beyond the reach of working-class Americans.

In Arizona, for instance, homelessness surged by 51.5% between 2017 and 2022, a direct consequence of municipal regulations that strangle housing development. 

By limiting the types of housing that can be built and imposing costly requirements on developers, these regulations have effectively priced many Americans out of the housing market.

Rent control, another popular government intervention, has been shown to reduce the quantity of available housing.

A Stanford study found that rent control in San Francisco reduced rental housing supply by 15% and led to a 5.1% city-wide rent increase.

These policies, while well-intentioned, often end up hurting the very people they aim to help.

The solution lies not in more government control, but in unleashing the power of the free market.

By removing unnecessary regulations and allowing market forces to operate freely, we can create a more affordable housing market.

Deregulation would allow for increased housing supply, addressing the root cause of high prices. By removing zoning laws and simplifying building codes, we can enable the construction of a diverse range of housing options, catering to all income levels.

Critics may argue that a free market approach would lead to gentrification and displacement. However, the reality is that our current system of artificial scarcity is what truly drives these problems. By increasing overall housing supply, we can alleviate pressure on existing affordable neighborhoods.

The power of the free market to solve housing issues is not merely theoretical.

In Houston, a city known for not having formal zoning laws, housing costs have remained significantly lower than in other major U.S. cities. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the median home value in Houston is $263,315, compared to $947,245 in Los Angeles and $766,160 in New York.

Japan provides another compelling example.

Despite being a densely populated country with limited land, Japan has managed to keep housing affordable in its major cities through market-oriented policies. Tokyo, one of the world’s largest metropolitan areas, has seen housing prices remain stable over the past two decades, largely due to flexible zoning laws and a streamlined building permit process.

It’s important to note that embracing free market solutions doesn’t mean abandoning those in need. Private charities and non-profit organizations can play a crucial role in providing targeted assistance to the most vulnerable populations. These organizations often operate more efficiently and flexibly than government programs, adapting quickly to changing needs.

The path forward is clear. To truly address our housing crisis, we must embrace free market solutions. This means rolling back restrictive zoning laws, streamlining building permits, and allowing developers to respond to market demands without unnecessary interference.

The stakes are too high to continue with failed policies of the past.

It’s time for policymakers to recognize that the solution to our housing crisis lies not in more government control, but in the free market. Only then can we hope to create a housing market that truly serves the needs of all Americans, providing affordable and quality housing options for generations to come.