The Bond Canary In The “Big Beautiful” Coal Mine

Submitted by QTR’s Fringe Finance

With the passage of President Trump’s so-called “Big Beautiful Bill”—a sprawling new fiscal stimulus and infrastructure package—the U.S. bond market should be in the spotlight, if you ask me.

This legislation, which mostly accelerates deficit spending at a time when debt servicing costs are already surging, is colliding with a Treasury market that has shown persistent signs of instability over the past year. Investors should be watching this space very closely.

Libertarians and fiscal conservatives are sharply critical of Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill,” arguing it fuels runaway spending, expands government power, and deepens the national debt without accountability. They see it as the latest bipartisan failure to exercise fiscal discipline, especially given the total disregard for the debt ceiling and the growing risk of fiscal dominance, where the Fed is pressured to keep rates low to finance government borrowing.

Critics warn that the bill crowds out private investment, distorts markets, and sets the stage for inflation and long-term instability—betraying principles of limited government and economic freedom in favor of politically driven, debt-funded expansion.

Meanwhile, over the past six months, the U.S. Treasury market has shown mounting signs of stress, reflecting a growing disconnect between fiscal policy and investor confidence.

Multiple long-duration bond auctions have seen weak demand, with bid-to-cover ratios falling and yields coming in higher than expected, indicating that buyers are becoming more reluctant to absorb the government’s growing debt load. Despite market expectations for Fed rate cuts, long-term yields have remained stubbornly high or even risen, suggesting that concerns over inflation and deficit spending are outweighing hopes for monetary easing.

The yield curve, which had been deeply inverted, has begun to steepen—not because of optimism, but due to long yields drifting higher, a hallmark of market anxiety over long-term fiscal sustainability. Volatility in the bond market, as captured by the MOVE Index, has remained elevated, while foreign demand from major holders like China and Japan has continued to decline, shifting the burden of new issuance onto domestic buyers.

Liquidity in the secondary Treasury market has also deteriorated at times, with widened bid-ask spreads and reduced depth, especially during periods of heavy supply. Primary dealers have reported strain in absorbing growing issuance without central bank support, leading to a visible increase in term premiums. These term premiums have surged as investors demand greater compensation for holding long-dated Treasuries, reflecting concerns about both inflation control and the long-term credibility of U.S. fiscal policy.

Adding to this is a breakdown in typical market correlations, with stocks and bonds occasionally falling in tandem—undermining Treasuries’ role as a portfolio hedge.

Finally, there’s been a notable shift in investor preference toward shorter-duration instruments like T-bills, signaling widespread reluctance to take on long-term interest rate and inflation risk in today’s uncertain environment.

 JULY 4 SALE - 50% OFF FOR LIFE: Using this coupon entitles you to 50% off an annual subscription to Fringe Finance for life: Get 50% off forever

The Federal Reserve may have maintained its benchmark policy rate within the 4.25%–4.50% range, but bond yields have refused to cooperate with the narrative of a gentle economic landing or a disinflationary environment.

The 10-year Treasury yield recently climbed to around 4.60%, while the 30-year surged past 5.08%—levels not seen since late 2023. These moves have come despite a more dovish tone from the Fed and growing market expectations for rate cuts. In other words, long-term yields are drifting higher even as short-term rates are poised to decline—a textbook signal that something is broken in the transmission mechanism between monetary policy and financial markets.

One of the clearest illustrations of this disconnect has been recent bond auctions. On May 21, 2025, the U.S. Treasury’s 20-year bond auction drew some of the weakest demand seen in over a year. The auction yielded 5.05%, but immediately afterward, yields shot higher to 5.13%. This wasn’t just an anomaly. A month later, the 30-year bond auction on June 12 raised $22 billion at a yield of about 4.844%, with only lukewarm investor interest. Foreign participation remained soft, and domestic buyers appeared cautious.

The message appears to be clear: as Treasury issuance ramps up to fund new government spending, buyers are demanding more compensation—or simply not showing up.

This dynamic is fueling a growing sense that the U.S. is entering a regime of fiscal dominance—a condition where monetary policy becomes increasingly constrained by the government’s need to finance itself cheaply.

In the past, the Federal Reserve could raise or lower rates based purely on its dual mandate of inflation and employment. Today, that independence is being tested. With deficits projected to exceed $2 trillion annually even before Trump’s bill takes full effect, and interest costs threatening to consume a dangerous share of federal revenues, the Fed may find itself boxed in. It’s easy to imagine a scenario where bond yields spike further, financial conditions tighten, and the Fed is pressured to step in—not to fight inflation, but to ensure the government can keep borrowing.

These stresses are not limited to a wonky corner of the market. They impact every portfolio. Elevated yields hurt the value of existing bonds, while eroding the relative safety and utility of traditional fixed-income allocations. Worse, if the Fed is eventually forced to resume quantitative easing or suppress long-term yields artificially, it could reignite inflationary pressures—just as policymakers are trying to declare victory on price stability.

This is why I continue to favor tangible, finite assets that are insulated from political interference and monetary distortion. Gold and silver remain essential hedges against inflation and systemic risk. Bitcoin, with its fixed supply and decentralized architecture, represents a digital alternative to fiat currencies increasingly weighed down by sovereign overreach. Real assets—including productive land, select commodities, and certain types of real estate—offer intrinsic value that isn’t easily diluted.

What we’re seeing now is a market in transition. The old model—where the Fed could engineer soft landings and the Treasury market would quietly absorb endless supply—is breaking down.

With bond yields rising in defiance of Fed policy, auctions repeatedly falling flat, and deficits spiraling higher, investors can no longer afford to treat U.S. debt as the unquestioned “safe asset.”

The passage of Trump’s new spending bill makes this a critical moment to watch the bond market closely. If yields continue climbing or auctions deteriorate further, it may signal that the market is rejecting the premise of unlimited fiscal expansion—and that the Treasury market is no longer functioning normally.

Now read:

• FDA Exposed: Hundreds of Drugs Approved Without Proof They Work
• “Seize The Means Of Production”: Mamdani Lays Bare His Agenda
• Critics Of Capitalism Misunderstand Economic Success
• Powell: No Pivot, No Party
• Hey Dems: Unseat Mamdani And You’ll Win The 2028 National
• Beware Of When The Smoke Clears
• 3 Misconceptions About US Debt: Lyn Alden

QTR’s Disclaimer: Please read my full legal disclaimer on my About page here. This post represents my opinions only. In addition, please understand I am an idiot and often get things wrong and lose money. I may own or transact in any names mentioned in this piece at any time without warning. Contributor posts and aggregated posts have been hand selected by me, have not been fact checked and are the opinions of their authors. They are either submitted to QTR by their author, reprinted under a Creative Commons license with my best effort to uphold what the license asks, or with the permission of the author.

This is not a recommendation to buy or sell any stocks or securities, just my opinions. I often lose money on positions I trade/invest in. I may add any name mentioned in this article and sell any name mentioned in this piece at any time, without further warning. None of this is a solicitation to buy or sell securities. I may or may not own names I write about and are watching. Sometimes I’m bullish without owning things, sometimes I’m bearish and do own things. Just assume my positions could be exactly the opposite of what you think they are just in case. If I’m long I could quickly be short and vice versa. I won’t update my positions. All positions can change immediately as soon as I publish this, with or without notice and at any point I can be long, short or neutral on any position. You are on your own. Do not make decisions based on my blog. I exist on the fringe. The publisher does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. These are not the opinions of any of my employers, partners, or associates. I did my best to be honest about my disclosures but can’t guarantee I am right; I write these posts after a couple beers sometimes. I edit after my posts are published because I’m impatient and lazy, so if you see a typo, check back in a half hour. Also, I just straight up get shit wrong a lot. I mention it twice because it’s that important.