Gaza 2035 Update

Article posted with permission from the author, Karen Schumacher

In a previous article, the plan to rebuild Gaza was revealed.  Those same players have now released an updated version and what they are doing should be understood as a warning to the world.  While the media was banned from entering the area due to the fighting, that ban continues to exist even though the fighting has essentially ended, making it very difficult to see how this Gaza and Middle East economic transformation is being executed.

This takeover of Gaza has been a Trump plan for many years.  A 2020 archived White House website revealed his true intentions, which were disrupted when he did not get re-elected, but the 2020 Abraham Accords put it into motion.

In the new updated plan, called the Gaza Reconstitution, Economic Acceleration and Transformation, or “Great Trust” for short, the title alone defines the intention for an economic transformation.  But it isn’t limited to Gaza, it is intended for several countries in the region.  In true technocratic fashion, all control and decisions will be taken away from Gaza citizens, instead building the area on Sustainable Development Goals (pg 56) ideology.

The plan states, “It can start as a US-Israel bilateral agreement, taking control from Israel to the US…”, with funding based on tokenization.  The plan goes on to mention IMEC, which stands for the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor that was formally announced at the 2023 G20 meeting during Biden’s reign.  IMEC is an initiative between India, the Middle East, and Europe that builds an infrastructure for transportation, communication, and trade, which promotes economic development, and Gaza was needed for this initiative.  The G20 meeting was clearly intended to implement Agenda 2030 in the region.

The capture of Gaza, labeled in the Plan as an “Iranian outpost” and threat to IMEC, was needed for this economic corridor to “transform into a Mediterranean hub for manufacturing, trade, data, and tourism”, and “access to markets…all supported by Israeli tech and GCC investments.”

As part of its “10 Mega Projects,” an “Elon Musk Smart Manufacturing Zone” and “Gaza Trump Riviera & Islands” would be developed.  “Gaza Planned Cities” will be “AI-powered” through an “ID-based digital system,” and railway, pipelines, and fibers will connect regional hubs across IMEC.

Initially, “30+%” of public Gazan land “will be leased to the Trust for 25-99 years, and a “blockchain registry for land and tokenization” developed.  Gazans can exchange their private land for a token in the Trust, then “redeem their tokens for ownership of rebuilt residences”.  The Trust decides how those residences would be built.

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), now shuttered, was intended to provide aid to Gazans as reconstruction took place.  Included in the plan are Voluntary Relocation Programs that outline how Gazans would be assisted in remaining in Gaza or in leaving the area, while saving $500 million “on every 1% relocating”.

Over the next 10 years, an estimated “$185B in revenue” would be generated for the industry and “increase the value of Gaza to ~$324B” from nothing as it stands today.  This is a sad commentary on the destruction of Gaza land and its people, looking at it as a monetary accomplishment.

Gaza would serve as a major hub for IMEC, having high-speed rail and a freight corridor, a $3 billion/year tourism industry, and a hyperscale data center.  There is no mention of Gaza citizens participating in these decisions or providing input.  Rebuilding Gaza for this hub includes the infrastructure, security, and education, with workforce development.  Public-private partnerships (PPP) will build medical facilities, broadband, rail infrastructure, and deep port construction while non-PPP will build tourism infrastructure, regional data centers for Cloud Service Providers, and advanced manufacturing facilities.

The Trust will provide 100% investment in: UXO, debris removal, temporary housing, security, basic infrastructure, and workforce development.  President Trump initially committed $10 billion US dollars to the rebuilding of Gaza, but has now raised that amount to $17 billion, so far without congressional approval.  In spite of this, the plan is short of cash.  Caveats to reduce the needed money include increasing the number of Gazans leaving, increasing PPPs, using debt for financing, increasing international aid, and hastening the reconstruction timelines.   Building this corridor has already begun.

While this whole plan is about making money, it is also about oil.  In 1971, President Nixon removed the gold standard and, in doing so, created the petrodollar.  Oil-producing countries needed to keep U.S. dollars on hand for oil transactions and for other investments in the global economy, putting the U.S. dollar in demand.  Saudi Arabia, in return, also received military and political support.  However, Saudi Arabia has been slowly detaching itself from the dollar for several years.

There is a belief currently underway that the petrodollar is ending.  Gulf countries no longer need to rely on it for energy transactions, even suggesting it is “de-dollarizing” the economy, that a new financial world is being created with a new financial market, along with a functioning parallel financial system.  The stablecoin will be the new petrodollar and the new method of payment.

Enter digital currency and the World Financial Liberty (WLFI) organization, co-founded by President Trump and sons, and its stablecoin USD1.  Not only has WLFI played a significant financial role with IMEC countries, but it is also taking steps to enter the tokenization of oil and other real-world assets (RWA).

Just before Trump’s inauguration in January, 2025, Aryam Investment 1, backed by United Arab Emeritus (UAE) National Security Adviser Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, bought a 49% stake in WLFI for $500 million, making Aryam Investment 1 the largest shareholder in WLFI.

Shortly after his inauguration, President Trump then granted the UAE access to 500,000 advanced AI chips annually, which could not be obtained under Biden, and which could be used for two IMEC projects, artificial intelligence and data centers.  Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, tech and surveillance expert, and billionaire, was the chair of the Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund at that time.

In June, 2025, the UAE investment group, Aqua 1 Foundation, that accelerates blockchain financial systems and real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, bought $100 million dollars of USD1 stablecoin.

Also in 2025, WLFI’s USD1 stable coin was chosen as part of an Emirati-backed deal ”to close MGX’s $2 billion investment in Binance,” which is a cryptocurrency exchange platform that operates across the world, and with a very checkered history.  WLFI also integrated blockchain technology across Pakistan through a deal with the Pakistan Crypto Council, with some allegations towards President Trump.  Concern has been expressed about other WLFI deals that have not been fully disclosed.

Recently, WLFI applied “to form a national trust bank” that would “place its USD1 stablecoin under direct federal supervision in a regulatory category”.  It would also “allow WLFI to formally issue and hold its own dollar-pegged stablecoin…and…permit the company to offer services like holding digital assets for customers and converting stablecoins.”  This adds another needed component towards building the new financial system.

The point is, WLFI is networking itself across the Middle East that easily fits into the digitally run Great Trust plan.  It has advanced far enough that oil and Iran have now become factors in this scheme.

While the Great Trust plan does not reference the energy sector, the Board of Peace does reference the New Gaza Energy and Digital Infrastructure in Jared Kushner’s January 2026 World Economic Forum Davos presentation on page 7.  There have also been hints of Iran joining the fray, which has maybe been the goal all along, not solely for the elimination of nuclear threats.

IMEC will increase energy flows through the corridor with new routes for oil transports being considered.  However, strategically, the UAE has already built an alternate oil route with its Habshan-Fujairah pipeline, and releasing it from the petrodollar is an advantage to IMEC member India.  Saudi Arabia has its own alternate route, Petroline.

Iran has been a thorn in the side of this Gaza plan, and as seen by these IMEC maps, control over the Strait of Hormuz is needed for the IMEC agenda.  The United Nations is even in on it, and the World Economic Forum supports it.  Iran knows this is a threat and might be connected to the Fujairah bombing on May 5 and the bombing of the Saudi Arabia pipeline.

With the weakening petrodollar and the deals that have been made with WLFI, the stablecoin financial sector is being built for trading in the energy sector with stablecoins, fitting nicely into the Great Trust plan.

Solana is a global computer network that processes transactions and keeps a record of them, and in which USD1 is involved.  With the exit of the UAE  from OPEC, it is one more step to integrate the energy market into the overall IMEC financial and technocratic goals.

WLFI has already connected with Chainlink Data Services with a platform for the tokenization of oil.  Tokenizing oil has not yet reached full maturity, as explained in this Chainlink article, but the efforts continue to be built and are expanding.  It is the “convergence of the industrial world and the digital economy” and “energy assets on-chain will likely become a cornerstone of modern financial markets,” just as the petrodollar.  As a Co-Founder and LITRO Lead Architect, Baron Lamarre will be launching his tokenized oil in January 2027.

Patrick Wood’s article, Why Trump’s Takeover In Gaza Preceded The War In Iran, explains this betrayal.  ”Trump and Kushner designed the diplomatic framework. Gulf sovereign wealth — hundreds of millions of Islamic investment capital — funds the financial infrastructure. World Liberty Financial’s USD1 stablecoin is the designated payment instrument. The Board of Peace is the governance vehicle. Each component was in place before the first bomb fell on Iran.”  This article articulates the same as well, calling it “a corporatized trusteeship for capital, cloaked in the language of peace, progress, and partnership.”  A similar perspective can be found here.

This scheme has been planned for a long time, beginning with Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, drafting the Abraham Accords, then profiting from Middle East deals where he has been part of a diplomatic envoy.  Meanwhile, the parallel financial system is being built by Trump and Witkoff sons, potentially overtaking the U.S. dollar financial system, a full-blown Constitutional violation, and tokenizing all assets into a digital system.  This, and the technocratic agenda, are cloaked under the guise of an international organization that will bring peace.

Most horrific is that Gaza has been devastated for the sole purpose of building their technocratic vision of digital control over humans, with an education system designed to produce the workforce that will support their profits.  The Board of Peace Charter outlines how these technocrats will make all decisions through a corporate “technocratic, apolitical Palestinian committee” governance structure, where no Gaza citizen will have a voice in any facet of their lives, even dictating the style (pg 86) of the building in which they will live.  This Board will never dissolve as suggested in Article 10.2., they will have too much power and control.

Some may perceive all of this information as nothing but an opinion, but the facts that support what is happening are there.  In one aspect, it is nothing more than one massive business and economic deal being negotiated by two private real estate developers who are clothed as an envoy to negotiate peace.  Others might perceive it as a geopolitical move with IMEC being an alternative to China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).  Regardless, the motives are clear for more power and control for technocratic dominance, and the technology and wealth are present to make it happen.

How much longer will the Constitution protect the United States from this world transformation in which it will eventually, and most likely, be forced to participate?