Douglas Macgregor: "War Is Inevitable" (Video)

In this 25 September 2025 published video, host Glenn Diesen talks with Colonel Douglas Macgregor, a retired Colonel and former seior advisor to the U.S. Secretary of Defense.

Col. Macgregor argues that the decision has been made for another war with Iran. On the European front, Trump makes absurd and dangerous statements about the proxy war in Ukraine, while simultaneously pulling out. The Europeans are left with the responsibility for the losing war in Ukraine, and panic is setting in.

The assertion that war with Iran is inevitable is a subject of ongoing debate and is not a universally accepted fact. While recent tensions and military actions have increased the risk of direct conflict, major international actors continue to engage in diplomatic efforts to prevent a full-scale war. 

https://youtu.be/k1FkIZaAhHE

AI created article of factors contributing to the risk of war with Iran.

• Escalating confrontations between Iran and Israel: In 2024 and 2025, the long-running shadow war between Israel and Iran escalated into more direct military exchanges. Following an Israeli airstrike on the Iranian consulate in Damascus in April 2024, Iran retaliated with a massive missile and drone attack on Israel. The tit-for-tat strikes have continued, pushing the two nations closer to an all-out confrontation.
• Iran’s nuclear program: Concerns over Iran’s nuclear program persist, especially after the collapse of the 2015 nuclear deal. As of September 2025, Iran continues to enrich uranium, and some Western powers, including France, have warned that a military confrontation is “almost inevitable” without a new nuclear deal.
• Regional instability and proxies: Iran’s network of regional proxies, including Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen, further complicates the security landscape. Ongoing conflicts, such as the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza, can trigger broader regional conflagrations and increase the risk of direct U.S. involvement.
• Political pressure and rhetoric: Statements from political leaders in Iran, Israel, and the U.S. have contributed to the perception of potential conflict. For instance, some Israeli officials have been quoted suggesting a war with Iran is “inevitable”. The prospect of a second Donald Trump administration and its potential impact on U.S. policy toward Iran is also a source of international concern. 

Arguments against the inevitability of war

• Diplomatic channels remain active: Despite the heightened rhetoric, diplomatic talks with Iran have not been completely abandoned. In August 2025, negotiations between the U.S. and Iran took place in Norway, signaling an ongoing effort to seek diplomatic solutions.
• Both sides prefer de-escalation over all-out war: Analysts have noted that while tensions are high, neither the U.S. nor Iran desires a major, full-scale war. Both sides have at times pulled back from the brink, suggesting they have a mutual interest in avoiding a larger conflict. For example, a ceasefire between Israel and Iran was established in late June 2025, although it remains fragile.
• Risk of regional and global consequences: The potential consequences of a full-scale war, including regional instability, disrupted oil markets, and the involvement of other global powers, create a strong deterrent. A war could also draw in other regional actors and destabilize the wider Middle East.
• Public and political opposition: A significant portion of the U.S. public and political establishment has shown opposition to further military engagement in the Middle East. Many have expressed concern about the constitutional implications of offensive military action against Iran without Congressional approval.