Prince Andrew Arrested: I'm Going to Name Who He Leaked Classified Information To – Andrew Lownie (Video)

by N.Morgan

(Turn off VPN, as it can block certain videos, like Rumble)

I may not agree with everything from the content producers I share. Apply critical thinking and use discernment to form your own conclusions about the content in the videos.

FOLLOW ME ON TELEGRAM: https://t.me/NicoleM420

Join Telegram Group: https://t.me/+J3uYoyqtvvY2OTAx

Did Prince Andrew compromise national security—and if so, was he acting alone? In this episode of Heretics, I’m joined by royal biographer Andrew Lownie to examine disturbing questions raised by newly scrutinized material surrounding Andrew’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The focus isn’t gossip—it’s access, influence, and whether sensitive information was improperly shared.

Lownie explains why Andrew’s role as a trade envoy matters far more than most people realize. That position placed him in proximity to confidential briefings, diplomatic intelligence, and high-level discussions. According to Lownie’s research, Andrew’s continued association with Epstein during this period raises legitimate concerns about judgment, boundaries, and risk exposure. These are investigative questions grounded in timelines, roles, and documented access—not speculation dressed up as certainty.

The conversation digs into how Epstein gained extraordinary reach into elite circles and why Andrew remained close long after others cut ties. Lownie outlines the unanswered questions around who benefited from that access, who else may have been present in key conversations, and why normal safeguards appear to have failed. If sensitive information moved informally, who knew—and who chose not to look?

We also explore the institutional response. Why has there been no transparent accounting of what Andrew may have shared, with whom, and when? Lownie argues that deference to the monarchy has repeatedly delayed scrutiny, creating the perception of a two-tier system where accountability stops at the palace gates. The result is a vacuum filled with suspicion rather than facts.

Importantly, this episode keeps its footing in evidence and process. Lownie explains how historians and investigators work with documents, correspondence, and patterns of behavior—and why stonewalling only deepens public mistrust. He also discusses why the royal family’s handling of the fallout has compounded the damage and why a clear reckoning now would be less harmful than endless deflection.

This is not a verdict. It’s a demand for clarity. If classified or sensitive information was mishandled, the public deserves to know how risks were assessed and mitigated—and whether anyone beyond Andrew bears responsibility. If not, transparency is the fastest way to end the doubt.

If you want to understand how power, privilege, and secrecy intersect—and why the most important question may be who else was in the room—this episode is essential viewing.

The Daily Heretic

Stories Contributed by N. Morgan