Juan O' Savin: The Bond Collapse, Gold & The Reset Nobody’s Ready For (Video)

Apr 1: Trump urged nations dependent on the Strait for oil to “grab it and cherish it,” asserting that they must take the lead in securing the passage for their own needs.

Apr 2, Reuters: About 40 countries are discussing joint action to reopen the Strait of Hormuz to stop ‌Iran holding “the global economy hostage,” Britain said on Thurs.
______

The current global economic crisis, centered on the blockade of Strait of Hormuz, represents a deliberate weaponization of energy by the Globalists. Trump has called out France and Britain, challenging them to find some ‘delayed courage’ and just ‘TAKE’ the Hormuz Strait. Is his solution actually as straightforward as he claims it to be?

Iran’s parliament has moved to institutionalize its control over the Strait with the passing of a bill on March 30 that mandates transit fees. To bypass intl. sanctions, the new law requires all tolls to be paid via yuan or stablecoins pegged to Chinese currency.

Iran has denied Strait access to US, Israel and their allies. Therefore, even if a joint action by nations is successful at releasing the stranded vessels, how do US/Israel “allies” such as EU-NATO countries see resumption of traffic?

Even if nations in Asia gain access, does the entry inevitably get denied because of vessel ownership? Which would mean the Alliance has proof of ownership to all vessels passing through the Strait. Perhaps with coordinated help from Russia and China?

With Iran…

the start of Russia/Ukraine conflict, and EU’s “green & industrial”, “digital sovereignty” reset, “global gateway strategy” (BRI alternative), how will they steer through the current crisis where a chronic lack of investments and global decoupling threatens nations “sovereign stability and sustainability”?

At what point will the energy crisis trigger significant social unrest, where the “Brussels Effect” will essentially disintegrate by default.

◇ While Trump has taunted these nations, and 40 countries have jointly discussed the re-opening of the Strait, it doesn’t remove the primary obstacle that stands in their way – “US, Israel and their allies are denied Strait of Hormuz access.”

Is the primary hidden agenda for a 40-nation meeting to ensure UK-EU-NATO military materiel remains untouched. Where perhaps UK-EU contribution would only be through financial, logistics support. This would essentially allow their fronts with Russia to remain intact. By attempting to setup this alternative, is there a multi-faceted strategy that they hope to achieve?

1) To reiterate – third-party security measures would be practically pointless if they don’t overcome Iran’s ban on ‘allied’ ships (e.g. Japan, Philippines). As long as vessel ownership dictates entry, the security measures cannot bypass Iran’s denial of access, making the efforts ineffective.”

2) Hungary and Slovakia, two land-locked nations who are part of EU and NATO remain…

Kaliningrad via the Suwałki Gap.

If EU-Globalists were successful in shifting Belarus into their fold:

~ The border with Russia would shift from integrated to securitized.
~ Would create a critical buffer zone for European security.
~ Neutralize the Suwałki Gap,
~ Secure Polish and Baltic borders.
~ Provide Ukraine’s northern border protection.
~ Remove Russian military infrastructure.

With a new alliance between two sovereign nations of Russia and US, is US influence in the region crucial to keeping such alliances as between Belarus and Russia intact – as the world transitions into new regional based economies, security?

4) If US were to exit NATO while Turkey, the alliance’s second largest military pivoted towards regional security post Iran conflict, would this constitute a fundamental transition toward a regionalized global defense architecture? Whereby any potential strategy with regards to Belarus would have to be abandoned as EU, UK without the backing US, Turkey’s militaries would have to face Belarus backed by a Superpower – Russia.

5) Therefore, what is the only option remaining for UK, EU-NATO?

~ With depleted military stockpiles in Ukraine, Iran, Israel/US conflict.
~ High probability of Turkey and US out of NATO.
~ Economic deterioration with soaring energy prices, logistics/supply chain disruption.
~ Internal unrest, forced reconfiguration of supply chains, focus on domestic rather than the collective union.
~ Energy supply from GCC nations and Israel severely disrupted with no timeline for resumption.
~ US security umbrella (military bases) destroyed in GCC nations further eroding their export abilities.
~ Labelled “enemies” of US and Israel, access to Strait of Hormuz denied.

Is the only viable option for UK, EU a phone call to Russia?