Are you a physicist? I could use your advice.

Here’s a speculative idea I’ve been working on — I’d love thoughts from anyone with a physics background.

We know from relativity that every object — person, planet, photon — has its own frame of reference. And relativity tells us these frames aren’t just different viewpoints; they are physically real.

Take the famous twin paradox: the traveling twin literally ages less. His clock actually runs slower. When the twins reunite, they don’t just seem to have experienced time differently — they have. Distances really contract or expand. It’s not just perception — it’s reality, shaped by motion and gravity.

There’s no universal “now.” No shared timeline. There is no single, absolute or underlying reality.

Each frame of reference is a physically distinct reality. It’s not just perception — it’s reality, shaped by motion and gravity.

Each of us literally exists in our own slightly different universe.

Most of these universes — these reference-frame realities — are nearly identical at human scales, which is why we think we share a single, common world. We believe we all see the same sunset, hear the same music, or strike the same tennis ball.

But what if this macroscopic agreement is only an illusion created by near-alignment?

At the quantum level, where even tiny differences matter, our separate realities may diverge enough to explain the fuzziness we observe — superpositions, uncertainty, entanglement.

I visualize this with a moiré pattern. Place multiple translucent, nearly identical grids on top of one another, and you get shifting interference patterns. Each translucent grid is a very slightly different reference frame — a slightly different universe.

The moiré effect — the pattern we each observe — is what we each call “reality.”

It shifts depending on how the layers (frames) interact. That’s why quantum phenomena seem blurry, probabilistic, or entangled. We’re seeing the interference pattern of multiple overlapping realities — not a single, fuzzy particle, but many near-identical versions of it, each in its own frame.

This isn’t Many-Worlds in the branching sense. It’s more like a standing wave of coexisting, overlapping universes, defined by their relative motion and position.

Entanglement could represent a kind of alignment across those frames — not “spooky action at a distance,” but synchronicity across already-linked layers.

Perhaps it’s all pure conjecture. But it feels like there’s something here — not just philosophically, but maybe even testably.

Has anyone proposed something similar? I’d love to hear from anyone who’s thought about this.

Rodger Malcolm Mitchell

Monetary Sovereignty

Twitter: @rodgermitchell

Search #monetarysovereignty

Facebook: Rodger Malcolm Mitchell;

MUCK RACK: https://muckrack.com/rodger-malcolm-mitchell;

https://www.academia.edu/

……………………………………………………………………..

A Government’s Sole Purpose is to Improve and Protect The People’s Lives.

MONETARY SOVEREIGNTY