When you know they are lying, you actually know a lot: Links 1 for January 23rd, 2026

1. Quite a good example of Marxist thought coming into conflict with Socratic thought. An American Marxist doctor pushes the Trans-Narrative up against the clinical facts.

2. Related to item 1.

When you know a person lies, you actually know a great deal. It also allows you to think differently about what they say (and so) in a couple of new ways. The simplest is to reexamine everything they have said and determine if there was any intent to truth in them. Not that they may have been mistaken or any other version of Hanlon’s Razor, but if they in fact have a pattern of lying in the past. Second is to move to a teleologically based analysis rather than a content based one. Put better, instead of taking what they say at face value, only think about what effect the statement might have overall. Especially to the agenda, if you know what the agenda of the speaker is of course. If you don’t know, a few statements with a telos based analysis and the agenda can usually be discerned.

So look at the trajectory of the thing talked about, usually in a more meta layer, rather than what the person’s lie actually means on the surface and to the thing being talked about. Which is usually not a real issue at all.

Here is an example of a dialectical jew doing exactly this at the WEF.

Examples of this are legion. Global warming was never about the climate. It was about the effects of the policies forced on Western nations due to the narrative of Global Warming. The lies itself would have been risible had it not been for how they were used to impoverish Western people, along with regular increments in losses of freedom. One of the more recent examples being how the German government shut down a feature of expensive cars remotely because they decided that there was an environmental cost to letting them warm up before people drove them. The real issue here in the meta, was the state suddenly flexing a muscle showing they can control your privately owned cars on a whim. What else the state can do to your car and what limitations they can impose can be reasonably guessed.

One way to identify the Marxist, communist or leftist leader is to see if they use language in this way. To force an outcome rather than inform any listener. This is why any discussion of what the public believes is of no real consequence. Once the state has launched a narrative attack, they will use it to accomplish the real goal of it, which again, has bugger all to do with whatever it is they are talking about. The narrative about mass Amer-Indian graves at Canadian Residential schools was an attack on private property overall, and it did its job and will continue to do so. The state may and likely will launch new narrative attacks to accomplish more destruction of individualism concerning property (and everything else) but the point is the purpose of the narrative on Residential schools. Whether or not the public believes the narrative is of no consequence whatsoever. Same goes for Global Warming. What matters is that no one of any real influence interferes with the narrative attack. We can know this by what happened to real doctors, scientists and even Nobel Prize winners who objected to the Covid narratives and especially the mRNA injection one.

This is so true that in most cases, arguing the facts against the narrative attacks is an allowable counter narrative because the purpose was never whatever it is they are talking about. It was about the effect on policy and the transfer of power from the individual in Republic style states, to the state itself. If you have enough authority that your factual assessment matters, you will be destroyed in any number of ways, yes. but for the general public, additional narrative attacks such as we saw by various ‘social media influencers’ parachuted in during Covid for example who appeared to be against the state narrative but actually supported them by making such ludicrous claims about the mRNA shots for example, that reasonable people dismissed all objections to them based on the wild claims by these agents. mRNA shots create bluetooth networks assembled in your blood which can be detected by cell phones from inside the graves of those who died of the shots as one example. This is so wildly stupid that it tends to make people dismiss the part that matters. That people died from the shots.

Considering all the above, even as mere hypotheticals, lets have a look at this statement by Mark Carney at Davos:

Not super confident this was Assange, but the case he makes seems reasonable.

Here, Carney destroys the critical and fundamental principles of equality before the law, and the concept of rights by looking at non-Canadians as a group deserving special ones, via The Frankfurt School’s Marcuse’ Repressive Tolerance 

While this may be a little bombastic a claim, actually at this point, it deserves its own adjective. It is a Trumpian claim. The fact that very often they are true, is another thing, but the claims that X is the biggest best greatest is almost uniquely a Trump attribute, But even discounting that, this Truth Social post will be impactful.

3. One of the streams of posts on my Twitter feed is endless evidence of major crimes against the American people coming out like a river. This of course creates its own frustrations. If this is known, why does nothing actually happen? Best case scenario is that the real justice of an actual Republic, and not the narrative attack the left accuses Trump of creating, a fascist state or whatever, moves very slowly and carefully because in a free nation, “it is better that 10 guilty men go free rather than one innocent go to jail.” in a leftist state, the opposite is the case. Actually the ratio is much, much, much worse. Like the Soviet Union or the United Kingdom today. So many of us cling to the notion that the Trump admin, quietly behind the scenes, are preparing the case for the prosecution in the feint hope that we can retake the belief that there is equality of law for all of us.

4. There are interesting reports of military assets moving here and there.

Click through to see all the items. Grok fact checked this as real and from reliable and authentic sources.

5. I wonder what Lloyd’s Of London would charge to insure this guy. I mean, if he is on the level.

More good news from the White House in a similar vein as the German Chancellor

It actually kinda looks like many leaders are using the plan,Orban had for the EU. Take it over on behalf of the people and proper Republican ideas, but for the WEF

Thank you all for checking out this site.

Source: https://vladtepesblog.com/2026/01/23/when-you-know-they-are-lying-you-actually-know-a-lot-links-1-for-january-23rd-2026/