Aerosols may warm or cool the climate depending on timing, new study finds

Professor: “Our results show that the atmosphere has a memory”. This means the same amount of aerosols can produce different temperature effects under different circumstances, as this graphic [credit: Hebrew University of Jerusalem] shows. Climate models to date don’t take this into account. The research recommends looking at ‘how atmospheric conditions evolve over days rather than relying solely on isolated observations’, to try and iron out ‘one of the largest sources of uncertainty in climate projections.’ (That suggests a lengthy list).
– – –
Summary from Eurekalert: Researchers discover that tiny atmospheric particles can have opposite effects on Earth’s climate depending on how quickly the atmosphere responds.

Why it matters: Aerosols are one of the largest sources of uncertainty in climate projections. This study shows that their impact can change over time, initially warming the atmosphere before later cooling it. The findings could help scientists improve climate models and make more accurate predictions of future climate change.
* * *
A new study from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem challenges a long-held assumption in climate science by showing that aerosols—tiny particles suspended in the atmosphere—can either warm or cool the climate depending on the timescale considered.

Led by Prof. Guy Dagan of the Fredy and Nadine Herrmann Institute of Earth Sciences, the research reveals that aerosol-cloud interactions can produce opposite climate effects in the short term and long term.

The findings, published in Nature Communications, offer a new explanation for why aerosols remain one of the largest sources of uncertainty in climate projections.

Aerosols come from a variety of natural and human-made sources, including air pollution, wildfires, sea spray, and dust. Scientists have long known that these particles influence how clouds form and how much heat the Earth retains, but accurately estimating their overall impact on climate has proven difficult.
. . .
According to Prof. Dagan, the findings have important implications for both climate observations and climate modeling.

“Much of what we know about aerosol-cloud interactions comes from observing the atmosphere at a single moment in time,” said Prof. Dagan. “Our results show that the atmosphere has a memory. The climatic impact of aerosols depends not only on how many particles are present, but also on how rapidly conditions are changing and how much time the atmosphere has had to respond. Accounting for these timescales could help reduce one of the largest sources of uncertainty in climate projections.”

The findings suggest that scientists should pay closer attention to how atmospheric conditions evolve over days rather than relying solely on isolated observations.

Incorporating these time-dependent processes into climate models could improve estimates of aerosol-driven climate effects and lead to more accurate projections of future climate change. [Talkshop comment – or less inaccurate ones?].

Full article here.