Those That Resist Unconstitutional Flock Cameras Are “De-Flock Domestic Terrorists” - CEO Of Flock Cameras

Article posted with permission from the author, Bradlee Dean

“Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety,” -Benjamin Franklin

Ever since September 11, 2001, we have seen the conglomeration of unconstitutional agencies being erected by this government only to be leveled against the American people (Isaiah 28:18).

After doing so, they even went so far as to define God-fearing, patriotic, conservative Americans as “domestic terrorists.”

Friends, no foreign power on earth could have dreamed of doing what it is this government has been allowed to do to its own people (Psalm 94:20).

Now, moving fast forward into the present, and with thousands of constitutional violations and political crimes being committed against the American people, they are assuming authority that has never been delegated unto them in erecting Flock Cameras. Of course, this is being sold to the people under the guise of protecting the people from dangerous criminals, the very criminals that they have failed to prosecute (Amos 6:3).

These are also the same criminal politicians that have treasonously allured the illegals into this country with your tax dollars (Luke 22:48). Read Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution.

I’ll begin with the videos where Trump tells those who do not know the difference to stop fighting data centers: “You can’t fight it, you have to go with it.”

What is happening here is that people all over the country are not only protesting the implementation of these cameras but also tearing them down. Why? They violate the Fourth Amendment of the Bill of Rights.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

This guy here shows how the government has been erecting these cameras across the country under Donald Trump’s deceptive ‘Make America Great Again’ slogan.

This guy here flips the roles on those who are attempting to implement these cameras, and it does not go very well.  Remember, these are our representatives; we are not serfs!

This video highlights a man sharing with social media platforms how people across the country are becoming vigilantes (Psalm 94:16). Then, he takes a moment to also highlight how a police officer friend of his is the only one who doesn’t agree with people taking justice into their own hands.

Herein lies the problem with our public servants (this police officer): they have failed to uphold their own sworn oaths (Numbers 30:2).  If they did, they would be holding the representatives accountable for the crimes that they are guilty of committing, not attacking the people who are upholding the law in condemning the criminals!

Finally, here we have the CEO of Flock cameras not only advocating for a surveillance system in this country, but also going so far as to label Americans who say no to them as “Deflock domestic terrorists.” Sounds all too familiar, does it not?

The corrupt create the problem and then come behind it and play the problem solvers. These are the terrorists, people!

In conclusion: They always want us to give up our rights for the “common good.”

Politicians, bureaucrats, and especially judges would have you believe that too much freedom will result in chaos. Therefore, we should gladly give up some of our RIGHTS for the good of the community. In other words, people acting in the name of government say we need more laws and more JURORS to enforce these laws—even if we have to give up some RIGHTS in the process. They believe the more laws we have, the more control, thus a better society.

This theory may sound good on paper, and apparently many of our leaders think this way, as evidenced by the thousands of new laws that are added to the books each year in this country. However, no matter how cleverly this Marxist argument is made, the hard fact is that whenever you give up a RIGHT you lose a FREE CHOICE!

This just adds another level of control. Control’s real name is BONDAGE! The logical conclusion would be that if giving up some RIGHTS produces a better society, then by giving up all RIGHTS we could produce the perfect society. We could chain everybody to a tree for lack of TRUST. This may prevent a crime, but it would destroy PRIVACY, which is the heartbeat of FREEDOM! It would also destroy TRUST, which is the foundation of DIGNITY.

Rather than giving up RIGHTS, we should be giving up wrongs! The opposite of control is chaos. More laws do not make fewer criminals! We must give up wrongs, not rights, for a better society. William Pitt, of the British House of Commons, once proclaimed, “Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves” (Citizens Rule Book, page 9).

It’s time to put this into lawful perspective, friends.  As Thomas Jefferson rightly proclaimed, “Where the people fear the government you have tyranny; where the government fears the people, you have liberty.”

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media