Positive Developments in the Dr. Reiner Füllmich Case Thanks to United For Freedom

24.01.2026 www.kla.tv/40102

Video interview….

[Kla.TV:] Today, I welcome Karl Hummitzsch to our Kla.tv studio. You are the head of the German section of United for Freedom, the human rights organization, and deputy chairman of the Ethics Commission. Mr. Hummitzsch, two weeks ago today, you had an interesting and very informative conversation with Dr. Reiner Füllmich at the correctional facility in Bremervörde. We would like to talk a little about that today. If I understood correctly, it was a very explosive conversation.

[Mr. Hummitzsch:] I don’t want to forget to mention that he was very happy to see a human rights activist visit him in prison. We hugged each other out of sheer enthusiasm. So it was a very pleasant conversation indeed, very knowledgeable, and we were both delighted.

[Kla.TV:] I can well believe that. We have already discussed the topic of human rights, particularly in connection with Dr. Reiner Füllmich, in an interview. Once again, very briefly, about Dr. Reiner Füllmich. He is a lawyer, licensed in Germany and the United States. He has distinguished himself in particular during the Corona period in exposing Corona crimes in this Corona Commission, which he was a member of. But he also convened a grand jury in the US. He brought together 150 expert scientists, doctors, and lawyers. They drafted an indictment detailing these very COVID crimes. And then, surprisingly, he was charged. Somehow, he was accused of embezzlement or misappropriation of funds. We don’t want to go into that now. In any case, he was imprisoned in Mexico. How did that happen? Do you have any information about that? Could you explain that a little more, Mr. Hummitzsch?

[Mr. Hummitzsch:] Yes, we had a very good conversation. We also had plenty of time. He reported on how it came about that he was expelled from Mexico, if you can call it that. We have not yet been given access to the complete files. I can only refer to what he said and the files we have so far. According to this, he was lured to the consulate in Mexico under a pretext after his passports had disappeared. I can’t say for sure that this is exactly how it happened, but that’s what he reported and that’s what we know from the files. I assume that this is correct. He told me this in a very credible manner. Then he was told that the passports were where he was supposed to go to pick them up. And then there were replacement passports that he was supposed to receive. Then the old passports were found again. But then they said they were invalid. So it’s a very strange story, and I would say it is impossible that his was handled with good intent. It was very insidious, in my opinion. And so they took him to the airport. Then he got caught up in a procedure he didn’t immediately understand. He was taken to a migrant camp, a large hall full of migrants. This gave the impression that he was simply going to be deported like a migrant. But that doesn’t work, because it’s not fitting. He hadn’t done anything wrong. At no point. Also he had entered the country legally. So there was nothing against him in Mexico to justify deporting him.

[Kla.TV:] So far, it’s all very dubious. And you weren’t granted access to the files, even though you asked for it?

[Mr. Hummitzsch:] He then arrived in Germany. He was led down the stairs at the back, past the public. And downstairs, he was immediately arrested by police officers. He requested access to the files to find out why he had been arrested. He was not granted this. And even today, we still don’t have full access to the files. So it is illegal to arrest someone without informing them. And if that is the case, as I said, we still do not have access to the files. Then that would violate international guidelines.

[Kla.TV:] Which ones, for example? [Mr. Hummitzsch:] For example, Article 15 of the GDPR, the General Data Protection Regulation. Then Article 6 of the ECHR, which is the European Convention on Human Rights. And EU Directive 2012/13. So there are regulations that require someone who is detained to be given full information about why they are being arrested. And that is precisely what did not happen. That is illegal, to give one example. He also demanded it, as he told me. But it was not granted to him.

[Kla.TV:] Not granted at all, wow. And then he was first taken to the Rosdorf prison near Kassel. There he was held in solitary confinement for a certain period of time. That is also a violation of human rights. It is even white torture according to the UN Charter…

[Mr. Hummitzsch:] …yes, UN guidelines. They stipulate that you can only be held in solitary confinement for a maximum of 14 days. If it goes beyond that, it shortens your life. So he was in solitary confinement for six months. Yes, and that’s why we intervened. [Kla.TV:] You from United for Freedom intervened. What did you do specifically?

[Mr. Hummitzsch:] First, we briefly observed the trial. We had already looked into it beforehand, as far as possible. Then we talked to the lead defense attorney. We tried to understand what was actually being done to him. How he was being treated. Then we said we would take up the case. Until then, it had only been about legal issues and the relevant paragraphs on both sides, that is the court and the defense. But we approach human rights issues completely differently. That’s what we did. We submitted a 30-page paper to Füllmich’s lawyers. The lawyers submitted our paper. Ultimately, this led to success. He was later transferred to another prison. That is in Bremervörde, where I visited him. To be fair, I have to say that our intervention really worked out. He personally has no complaints about the treatment he receives. We find a normal prison situation, as one would imagine it. So it’s not nice, but it’s not the circumstances that existed before. Those no longer exist.

[Kla.TV:] Yes, wonderful. And we even heard Dr. Füllmich speak at a rally a few months ago, if I remember correctly. An audio message from him was played. He addressed the protesters in a very encouraging, very visionary way. That really gave me hope. Because he is an educator about Corona crimes. So we practically experienced him again, not just on the penalty bench, but on the playing field. Will this continue? Can we hope that he will now be allowed to remain active? Or how do you see it?

[Mr. Hummitzsch:] If it were up to the law, yes. Then he would be able to continue to move freely. He is not a convicted prisoner. He has not yet been convicted. He is basically a free man.

[Kla.TV:] Really.

[Mr. Hummitzsch:] Even if his fundamental rights are restricted in prison according to the methods customary there. Even if it seems to be customary there, he must not be denied his fundamental rights. Namely, he should be able to make phone calls. He should also be allowed to communicate with the outside world. Whenever he wants. He should be able to have his own money. So basically, he should be able to move around freely like a normal person. But he is not allowed to do so. So far, there has only been this one time that he was able to communicate with the outside world. Now he is prohibited from doing so. We will pay attention to these things. We will address them. Because it cannot remain this way. Legally, this is not permissible.

[Kla.TV:] So, if I understand correctly, Dr. Füllmich has not been legally convicted. His guilt has not been proven. So, according to the presumption of innocence, he would be a free man. So what is he doing in prison?

[Mr. Hummitzsch:] I would say he is not supposed to be allowed to speak freely. That is why he is being held under the pretext of “risk of fleeing”. That is what he is accused of.

[Kla.TV:] Ah, so that’s why he’s in prison, officially, because of the risk of fleeing. That’s the reason.

[Mr. Hummitzsch:] Yes, and then we looked into it. Well, there’s nothing to be found. There is no evidence that he wants to run away. So there are no clues that we have found so far. But as I said, we don’t have full access to the files yet. That’s why this statement should be taken with a grain of salt. However, from the files we do not see any risk of him fleeing. There is no reason to believe that he would. Accordingly, he could be released. Ankle monitors or other standard measures could certainly be provided for. If the court so decides. These are quite effective. So there would be no objection to that. We will consider this and provide the relevant legal references. The aim is to eliminate the “risk of fleeing” argument.

[Kla.TV:] So that means that with the so-called electronic ankle monitors, he could actually be free now and spend Christmas with his family?

[Mr. Hummitzsch:] That’s what I thought when I visited him. Because everything indicates that what is being done to him here is not lawful. But as I said, again with reservations. We really don’t have all the information. There may be reasons why they are keeping him in custody. But based on what we have seen so far, he should be able to be with his wife for Christmas. There would be no reason to keep him in custody any longer. But as I said, we have to go through another round with the lawyer now. Together with her, we will demand full access to the files. I expect that we will be successful with that. We are a human rights organization. That means we are neutral, international, and have corresponding rights. These are not yet enshrined in German law. They do exist in Germany, but it’s a different matter when Germany has ratified certain laws – international laws. We have acceded to many things and are obliged as Nation of Germany to accept these things as well. And we will invoke that.

[Kla.TV:] Ah yes, so these are international regulations such as the UN Charter, as they say, and there are similar things that are also binding for Germany. So that’s good news. That means that as soon as you have access to these files, the tide could turn in Reiner Füllmich’s favor within a very short time.

[Mr. Hummitzsch:] From a human rights perspective, we assume that it is legally possible. The question is, how will a German court react? How will judges and prosecutors behave? Will they comply with this law? There have already been cases where one wonders whether prosecutors and judges still actually adhere to German laws. Sometimes one gets the impression that it is handled very loosely, let’s say. So we already have our opinion on that. But it could be. As we have seen, the court by now has begun treating him fairly in terms of the prison houshold. The prison administration has made the necessary efforts. And that has worked. I can well imagine that discussions will continue on this basis. So he may well be released, with ankle monitors and other measures that will be ordered. But that he is kept in prison without a verdict. That’s unimaginable. Also, how he was treated. The previous mistreatment. Enough is enough. Also the discrimination against him, the way the public was misinformed. That is inhumane. That’s why it’s our impression and why we feel called upon as a human rights organization to intervene.

[Kla.TV:] Okay. At the time, this was clearly labeled as “lawfare”. That means a type of justice that is politically abused. In practical terms, it’s a way of somehow removing dissenters, such as the educator Dr. Reiner Füllmich, from the public stage. It was all very shady. But now you have a good view or a good expectation that this could change.

[Mr. Hummitzsch:] Yes, not only that. I don’t think removing him from the public stage is the purpose of the matter. My impression from the discussions is that they want to make an example of him, so to speak.

[Kla.TV:] In what way?

[Mr. Hummitzsch:] He is very well known in Germany. He has done a lot of educational work with top people who are honest and sincere. To the best of his knowledge, he has conducted research with many scientists and many experts. He presented all of this alongside his team. He did the same internationally. That is why he also has a very strong, very good reputation there. And so I can imagine that the goal could well be to make an example of him. Everyone who knows him should know: Hey, if you start rebelling and are basically doing good work, then the same thing could happen to you. That’s my impression when I look at the whole picture. The Füllmich case, an example for Germany and the world.

[Kla.TV:] Okay, fine. But on the other hand, there are also people and human rights organizations like United for Freedom who are keeping a very close eye on this. They are working to put a stop to such abuses of justice. And in that respect, it is also very encouraging. For all other whistleblowers as well. United for Freedom does not allow anyone to languish in prison, but ensures that people receive justice and are released. Provided they have not committed any crimes.

[Mr. Hummitzsch:] When you put it that way, I have to say, in all fairness, that we see both sides. It’s not just that we campaign against the wrongful behavior of the judiciary towards people. But when something is done reasonably and correctly, we also confirm that clearly and unequivocally. And that is why it is also important to me to mention the following. Work has been done on Füllmich’s situation. And now he is actually being treated well. I saw it myself. I was there for the second time now. The first time, he was a little lame in one leg. He probably had slept in an awkward position. I didn’t ask him about it. But I saw him walking away like that from behind. And this time I observed him again. And now he was completely relaxed. I have to say that’s the impression I got. And that’s how he behaved. He is being treated properly. With the exception of the illegalities. And I have to point that out. As I have explained, he has rights. And those rights are being curtailed. And we are taking action against that. These are legal issues that can be discussed. And we believe that is possible if presented reasonably. Judicial arguments and paragraphs are, so to speak, put on the table. We will discuss, we will engage in dialogue. Also with the public prosecutor’s office or the judges. Together with the defense, of course. I can well imagine that solutions are still possible here. So he won’t be left to rot there until eternity or until the final verdict. As for sentencing and criminal matters, as I said, I can’t comment on that. But in terms of human rights, there is a need for action.

[Kla.TV:] Great. Yes, then I am curious, we are curious, the world is curious to see how the Füllmich case will proceed. As well as what your access to the files will look like. What the results will be. We will stay in touch, Mr. Hummitzsch. Thank you very much for your information today.

[Mr. Hummitzsch:] I would also like to thank Kla.TV for this opportunity to bring this to the public’s attention. To show that we are doing very meticulous, very time-consuming work here. And that we are definitely being heard. Thank you very much for the interview.

from -

Sources/Links: United For Freedom – Human Rights Organisation https://uff-org.com/de/unsere-projekte/